User talk:Trevor Long
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:100_0997.JPG
Thank you for uploading Image:100_0997.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 01:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Walcharoadhotel-nov2006.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Walcharoadhotel-nov2006.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shyam (T/C) 07:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Walcharoadrailwaybar.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Walcharoadrailwaybar.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shyam (T/C) 07:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] disruptive edits
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to John Howard. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. See also Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point Peter Ballard 07:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Cheers mate, but i think it was clear in my edit that it was an obvious 'vandalism' which would have been reverted. This is a huge media topic right now and had to be demonstrated
- Yes. But it seems your edit was done to prove anyone can edit wikipedia. Of course anyone can edit wikipedia; you don't need to make disruptive edits to prove this! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rothery (talk • contribs) 12:56, August 24, 2007 (UTC)
Good, but you clearly are too stuck in your own tech goodness to realise that the MAJORITY of the population DONT KNOW THAT!!!
- Maybe the majority of the idiots who use whatever media outlet you work for. Rothery 23:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- in fact NO, i did a comprehensive search to check that. You all need to just calm down...
- Well, if I were you I might have done the same thing, as I wouldn't put much faith in talkback listeners, as I see you don't. Next time you do a segment about petrol prices maybe you better go to a mechanic to make sure that cars really do rely on the combustion of fuel to travel. Rothery 22:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- in fact NO, i did a comprehensive search to check that. You all need to just calm down...