User talk:TreveX

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome to the Fair Use Police
If I've put a reasonable rationale, please don't let that stop you!


edit

My talk archive

Contents

[edit] Good Article review of Independent Women's Forum

Thanks for the notice. I'm replying to some of your points at the article talk page now, and am working to address issues you raised. Cheers, DickClarkMises (talk) 03:00, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Okay, I think I've made some improvements that might allow us to check some things off of your list. DickClarkMises (talk) 04:25, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Please see my last major concern with the lead here: Talk:Independent_Women's_Forum#Gender.2FEquity_feminism DickClarkMises (talk) 23:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I think we are done: [1]. Let me know what you think. DickClarkMises (talk) 04:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] CfD nomination of Category:Fair use music samples

Category:Fair use music samples, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. –Black Falcon (Talk) 20:50, 19 May 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:BettyBigombe.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BettyBigombe.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:27, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Status of review

What's the status of your review for Jan Reimer? It seems that your suggestions for improvement haven't been answered, so I think it is safe to go ahead and fail the article. Nikki311 21:37, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The LGBTProject and its relation to HIVAIDS

A debate is going here which could use input from editors from outside our project. Thankyou. The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 12:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] House of Lords

Hi. I have just reverted your edit to the House of Lords article. I assume your "see also" text was intended for a different location, as it does not appear to have any bearing on the colours of Parliamentary benches. You may wish to reinsert your text into a more appropriate position. ^_~ Road Wizard (talk) 20:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)