User talk:Tree Biting Conspiracy/Archive 8
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Military Brats AfD
I don't know if you are watching this discussion or not, so I'm dropping a note here just in case. You wrote, "but the list of military brats and "possible" military brats is undeniably POV." I am questioning that statement that you and Dark Shikari made about it being POV list. I don't want to start another discussion here, so simply ask that you take a look at my response on the page and comment.Balloonman 20:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- A few weeks ago an article that I had just started working on was nominated for deletion. At that time, I indicated that I had just started working on it. Since you were one of the more critical voices towards this article, while voting to keep, I tought I'd seek out your feedback on the current state of the article. Could you go and take a look at it and let me know what you think? What areas still need to be improved? What do you like/don't like? I am still working on the article and know that it needs to be copy edited, so I'm primarily looking for tone/content advice. I'll watch your page for response. Thanks Balloonman 19:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
VP Ongoing Issue
For some reason my name has been removed from the list of authorized users. I was added by Betacommand here [1], and he welcommed me here[2]. I had difficulties using it, did everything I could myself, was unable to, so I requested assistance here [3]. Instead of assistance, I was removed from the list. Because I have had difficulties on wikipedia recieving help from administrators when requested, this message is in essence a generic template I am writing on all moderators' talk pages and discussion boards in the hopes of recieving if nothing else a response - ideally, however, a solution. Thank you very much and apologies for my impatience. Gregorof/(T) 05:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
My Editor Review and Assuming Good Faith
Hi! Thanks for participating in my review. A couple of things. 1. I would just like to say that I respectfully disagree with the statement that ""Enforcing" users to assume good faith is, ironically, not assuming good faith." The page you linked to states that "the very act of citing AGF assumes that the opponent is assuming bad faith." This is not necessarily true. If I make an edit, and someone else disagrees with it, but rather than politely open a dialogue with me, they accuse me of vandalism (which has happened), then their failure to adhere to GF is not an "assumption" on my part, but a fairly obvious statement of observation. Whether a person is acting in good faith is easily determined by the approach they take when disagreeing with another editor. The page also says that it is best not to cite the rule. But this is not reasonable. If a policy or guideline is being violated, then how else is it to be enforced if not with a polite admonishment? The page isn't even a policy or guideline itself, but an essay, and a poorly thought-out, ill-conceived one at that, one that I don't think should be cited as policy. The discussion on its Talk Page supports this. No offense.
2. Why do you feel I should participte in more project edits? Is this a required step for Admins? Why are projects pages more important than articles not a part of projects? Also, the area in which I have contributed the most number of edits is probably Comics, and you can see on my User Page that that subject is the one for which I listed the largest number of articles I worked on. Does the Project: Comics thing not count? And how can I find out where AfD's and other such projects are occurring? I would appreciate your input. Thanks again. :-) Nightscream 08:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Your input is appreciated. Sorry if I misunderstood your earlier comments. :-) Nightscream 15:09, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
VP
Yeah Im a Mod. I thought I did put my name there, Oh well will add. Thanks Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 16:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
DYK
--Allen3 talk 11:30, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks
Heh, thanks for the "awkward attempt at comedy." It's nice to see something other than template placement for a change. On a not-so-related note, have you put any thought into an RfA? It's okay if you haven't, no pressure or anything, but I'd be happy to nominate you. Best, --Mr. Lefty (talk) 20:55, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
About moving pages
When moving pages, such as List of Futurama Gadgets, please remember to fix any double redirects. I had to do this myself, so please remember in the future. Thank you. --AAA! (talk • contribs) 08:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
You helped choose Environmentalism as this week's WP:AID winner
AzaBot 18:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 6th.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Actuarial Outpost (2nd nomination)
Hello, TBC. What about the CAS's candidate liason? -- Avi 02:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Cats and Dogs Portals
Hi, TBC. If you can offer some tips on the respective portal talk pages about how to improve Cats and Dogs up to "featured" quality, it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Rfrisbietalk 18:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
User:Tree Biting Conspiracy/The Colbert Report recurring elements
Hi,
Per your request, I have userfied this to you at the above name. Sorry it took this long -- busy with the election yesterday. Best wishes, Xoloz 18:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Anthropology project
I have communicated with The Ungovernable Force regarding the proposed anthropology project which you indicated an interest in, and have gotten the OK from him to move the project into wiki-space and make it active. He indicated that he is busy in school right now, but will be as active as he can be given that. The project page as it now exists is only a minimum page, and could use the input of interested parties such as yourself. Personally, I did noticably poorly in the one cultural anthropology class I took in college, so I'm bowing out of this one, but wish you and the other members of the project the best of luck with it. Thank you. Badbilltucker 21:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia Weekly
Heya! Thanks for your suggestions for topics -- I really love a couple of them, and I'll be trying to slip them into an episode further down the line. Man, we have so much content to get through... we might have the bite the bullet and make our episodes that much longer...
That said, are you interested in being a panelist on, at least, episode 5? We'll be recording it this weekend at some point, and we still have at least one spot open if you'd like to fill it. :) Daveydweeb (chat/patch) 12:23, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
My RfA:
Thank you so very much for voting support in my RfA. However, I have withdrawn due to reasons that a stressed user would withdraw under. I'm sorry I have failed you & your expectations. Thanks, Spawn Man 09:02, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Hi Tree Biting Conspiracy, I am very thankful to you for supporting and comments on my succesful RfA. Shyam (T/C) 06:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks!
My RfA done I appreciate Anyway, I just |
EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Image source?
What was the source of Image:Mariovsdonkeykong4.PNG? —The Great Llama talk 20:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks
Thank you so much, Tree Biting Conspiracy, for your support in my RfA, which passed on November 11, 2006, with a final tally of 82/0/2. I am humbled by the kind support of so many fellow Wikipedians, and I vow to continue to work and improve with the help of these new tools. Should you have any request, do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Húsönd 21:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
DYK
--Allen3 talk 12:00, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
VandalProof User List and Fair use amendment
I've recently also gotten errors telling me that I'm not on the user list, and then later, that the list was corrupt. Thinking that it was something on my side, I traced VandalProof to the VandalProof "L" page, perhaps due to something wrong with the reverts? Hope it gets fixed soon!
Also, the fair use amendment allowing fair use images in portals is in limbo right now, as one side says it changes policy, the other says that it doesn't. Can you clarify this? Thanks. Ddcc 19:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Userpage
You helped choose Islam as this week's WP:AID winner
Dev920(Mind voting here?) 15:26, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Deletion review#Actuarial Outpost
You voted Delete at the article's AfD. You may wish to make your voice heard at its deletion review. Thank you. -- Avi 21:34, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
:)
I like your "R E T I R E D" box parody. I was thinking of making something like that. ★MESSEDROCKER★ 02:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 13th.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 2, Issue 46 | 13 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:41, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Template:Spa
Hello. I thought you had some good comments at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 November 14#Template:Spa. And even though I disagreed that the template should be deleted, some of your concerns are certainly valid. I have added some comments at Template talk:Spa#XfD discussions and concerns of possible misuse, which I hope might help prevent overly aggressive application of this template. Thanks, Satori Son 22:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Awesome
Wikipedia:List of Wikipedian contradictions and paradoxes - fantastic! Perhaps Wikipedia:This page left intentionally blank might interest you? - Ta bu shi da yu 07:50, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Improvements to the Psychology portal
Improvements to the Psychology portal Hi, I'm working on trying to get Portal:Psychology up to Featured portal status. Any tips you can offer on how to improve it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. Rfrisbietalk 16:03, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 20th.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:53, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
happy Turkey Day!!!!!
- Have a great day! Please respond on my talk page (the red "fan" link in my signature). Cheers! :) —Randfan!!
Cheers! :) —Randfan!! has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile at others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!
Science portal
Okay, here's a big one! Please offer any feedback you have at its talk page on how to improve this portal to featured status. Thanks. Rfrisbietalk 15:04, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: Issue IX - November 2006
The November 2006 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:20, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
RfA nom
I know you've turned down previous RfA nominations, but maybe you'll reconsider now. In your 2nd RfA you said you needed a month more of experience. That was on October 6, and today is November 27. Reconsider? Nishkid64 15:49, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Portal:Chemistry
WikiProject Chemistry would like to see this portal attain featured status. If you have any tips, tricks or suggestions, please feel free to add them here! Thanks, riana_dzasta 05:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 27th.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 2, Issue 48 | 27 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Newsletter
The November 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Cbrown1023 23:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
You helped choose Cactus as this week's WP:AID winner
MER-C 03:20, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for December 4th.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
|
||
Volume 2, Issue 49 | 4 December 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
|
|
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Re:RfA
Dang! I think you would make a great admin, TBC! Just two weeks ago, I asked Gogo Dodo to accept my RfA nomination, but he was inclined to decline because he felt he needed more experience. I eventually convinced him, and his RfA passed with almost 100% support! I hope you really do reconsider, TBC. If you don't feel ready yet, I understand, but be sure to tell me when you feel like going up for the RfA. I'll definitely nominate you in the future. =) Nishkid64 18:12, 9 December 2006 (UTC)==Military Brats AfD== I don't know if you are watching this discussion or not, so I'm dropping a note here just in case. You wrote, "but the list of military brats and "possible" military brats is undeniably POV." I am questioning that statement that you and Dark Shikari made about it being POV list. I don't want to start another discussion here, so simply ask that you take a look at my response on the page and comment.Balloonman 20:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
- A few weeks ago an article that I had just started working on was nominated for deletion. At that time, I indicated that I had just started working on it. Since you were one of the more critical voices towards this article, while voting to keep, I tought I'd seek out your feedback on the current state of the article. Could you go and take a look at it and let me know what you think? What areas still need to be improved? What do you like/don't like? I am still working on the article and know that it needs to be copy edited, so I'm primarily looking for tone/content advice. I'll watch your page for response. Thanks Balloonman 19:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)