From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: |
WikiProject Law (Rated Stub-Class) |
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
Low |
This article has been assessed as Low-importance on the assessment scale. |
WikiProject Germany (Rated Stub-Class) |
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
WikiProject Russian history (Rated Stub-Class) |
|
Treaty of Björkö is part of the WikiProject Russian history, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Russian history. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (add assessment comments) |
Low |
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. |
|
[edit] Howler
"The treaty was published by Bolsheviki in his work, Izvestiia". Wow. You don't even know what the Izvestia was? And pray tell, who do you think was this Mister Bosheviki? Come on, let's see the literal quote of what you were trying to lift from the literature this time. Fut.Perf. ☼ 18:41, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
"A.A. Knopf's work" edited by Bernstein!? No, Bernstein edited the letters, published them in the New York Herald, and they were republished by the publisher A.A.Knopf..
It might also be worth mentioning in this article that the treaty was immediately revoked by the tsar under advice of his ministers, and none of its provisions were ever put into effect. This is all in the same AHR article that is cited.
It is all fine and well to contribute stubs, but they should have a certain minimum quality. Contributing misleading and incomplete articles on treaties like this just confuses naive readers and creates work for other editors. I find it irresponsible. --Macrakis 22:56, 15 September 2006 (UTC)