Talk:Treaty of Amiens

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Treaty of Amiens article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, an attempt to provide information in a consistent format for articles about international organizations, diplomats, international meetings, and relations between states. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	Law Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been assessed as Mid-importance on the assessment scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a group devoted to the the study, and improvement of Wikipedia articles on the subject, of History. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked Neutrality: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no <!-- 6. It is written from a neutral point of view. --> |B-Class-6=yes/no

	France Portal Treaty of Amiens is within the scope of WikiProject France, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments, explaining the ratings and/or suggest improvements.)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the United Kingdom. For more information, visit the project page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Associated task forces (nations and regions): French military history task force Associated task forces (periods and conflicts): Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792–1815)

---

Does "French Guinea" here refer to French Guiana, or to some section of Africa? - Montréalais

The text is correct: the treaty concern French Guiana, not French Guinea. --Ann O'nyme 13:54, 22 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Someone should make a redirection thing for Peace of Amiens to point here - not sure how to do it or I would myself...

This article is rather incorrect and somewhat one-sided. For one thing, the Treaty was essentially broken by the Prime Minister, who was Addington, not Pitt as the Wiki article states. Addington was Prime Minister until 10th May 1804, and realised that his own negotiations had been wrong. He broke his own treaty because Napoleon was not holding up his own end of the bargain - the French were still occupying Holland and Savoy, and had just marched into Switzerland. He concluded that Napoleon could not be trusted and forbade the evacuation of Malta. 62.173.113.204 10:26, 21 October 2005 (UTC)Darkmind

I agree about the text being rather lopsided. In fact, some of it looks almost identical to the description at http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/encyclopedia/t/tr/treaty_of_amiens.htm except for a few changes to give the piece here a very-anti British spin. (Note how both pieces use the verb "balked" - but the other one I've given the link for mentions the French also weren't following the treaty). It'd be much better to give a fuller picture of both sides - such as the French annexations which raised tensions too. 86.53.37.182 12:17, 23 October 2005 (UTC) MarkP

Ok, I made a few changes. Hope it all looks ok. Darkmind1970 15:57, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

(Cut n paste from Reference desk, in case anything might prove useful Wetman 04:24, 21 May 2007 (UTC))

There was a considerable amout of war-weariness in Britain by the beginning of 1802, and the peace was widely welcomed by many ordinary people. Across the country there were feasts, firework displays and congratulatory addresses of one kind or another. The mood of relief was heightened still further when corn prices started to come down, and the income tax, introduced by William Pitt the Younger, was abolished by the new ministry of Henry Addington. The war itself, moreover, had, after nine long years, being getting absolutely nowhere, and ever since the Treaty of Luneville in February 1801 between France and Austria, Britain had been fighting alone. But Amiens was never more than a breathing space, a fact clearly recognised by governing circles in both London and Paris. Even so, there were many in England who were deeply critical of Addiington's peace, particularly among his political enemies, believing the price he had paid to be far too high. William Cobbett says that the terms of the treaty were 'universally condemned', and George Canning spoke out against the "gross faults and omissions, the weakness and the baseness, and shuffling and stupidity that mark this treaty."

History has not been entirely fair to Addington, and for sound reasons. Amiens, a peace that was no peace, had only been obtained by weakening the nation's strategic position, and by virtually surrendering Europe to Napoleon. But there were good grounds for seaking a break in hostilities. The national debt had grown to alarming proportions, trade was in serious deficit and, following a succession of bad harvests, inflation was in danger of getting out of control. By the spring of 1801 food shortages were the cause of widespread rioting, under the banner of 'Bread or Blood.' Addington, who replaced Pitt as Prime Minister in March 1801, was fully aware of growing back-bench hostility in the House of Commons against the war. Peace was necessary, Addington believed, not just to allow Britain a period of recovery, but to allow powers like Austria and Prussia time to rebuild their own strength and will to fight. Britain's defences were maintained in good shape, the peace notwithstanding, and lower taxation allowed trade to recover.

There were those, of course, who embraced the peace wholeheartedly, including Charles James Fox, the Whig leader, who took the opportunity to travel to Paris and visit Napoleon, then First Consul of France. But bit by bit British opinion turned against the peace. Anti-French fervour grew in intensity towards the close of 1802, as people became ever more aware of Napoleon's expansionist policy in Europe. Addington played a careful game, placing the country's finances in order and increasing its defensive capacity in perparation for the coming rupture. The navy was improved, as was the army. In May 1803 Britain declared war on France at a time that Addington judged best, and well before Napoleon's own plans were complete. The country now had the economic strength, the will and the power to continue the fight from this point forward with no further interruption. Clio the Muse 01:36, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

I've heard that the reason that Napoleon wasn't holding up to his end of the treaty, was that the British weren't holding up to theirs. If the Brits are going to violate and keep Malta, then the French will, an for an eye, keep Naples. Does this fit with the chronology? With the documentation?-A fellow —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.120.80.42 (talk) 21:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Saint-Domingue

Why was the French invasion of Saint-Domingue a factor in the breakdown of the peace (as stated in the article)? Saint-Domingue was still a French colony at the time. It doesn't seem to make sense that France's sending of troops to its own colony would be in violation of the treaty. Funnyhat 07:11, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Right, it wasn't: the invasion at Cap Français actually preceded the signing at Amiens: cf my new edits. Background on the revolution that was well under way at Saint-Domingue can be found here. --Wetman 01:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Ah, thanks. Makes more sense. Funnyhat 02:43, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Minorca

Didn´t the Treaty of Amiens also arrange for the return of Minorca to Spain? Or was it agreed in a separate, parallel treaty? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.4.112.58 (talk) 08:35, 15 February 2008 (UTC)