Image talk:Treatment of multiple sclerosis.ogg

Version reviewed: 1/26/2008

Technical quality: Medium.

• Still a few problems with popping and plosives, but good overall.
• GNU license statement not given at end of article as per Spoken Wikipedia recording guidelines. Only real reason for "Medium" rating.

Clarity: High.

• Minor issues with volume changes between takes/editing, and pacing.
• Excellent pronunciations of complex medical terms.

Accuracy: High.

• There either seemed to be significant ad-libbing from Section 3 onward, or the article version linked maybe be slightly out of date. In either case, they did not compromise the meaning of the source text.

Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.