User talk:Transcendentalstate

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Transcendentalstate, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

User:Interiot/Tool2/code.js

–Sango123 19:55, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

[edit] Re:Psych

Thanks for agreeing. I've seen people add statements like those and eventually they are almost always deleted due to the original research policy. :) And thanks for the userpage comment. Welcome, by the way! -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 00:26, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re:Shawn Spencer Infobox

No problem. Actually, I'm glad to see someone working on some of the new summer television series. Your account seems to be new, but you seem to be catching on to things very quickly, having accomplished quite a bit already. As for hardcoded infoboxes on Veronica Mars character articles, I have no idea why that is, as someone made a custom infobox just for the series. Perhaps I may get motivated to do something about it. Anyway, good work, and happy editing! Dancter 16:43, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Eureka navbox

I'll leave your style, but consistency is not something you claim as a reason for reverting. It's almost never consistent. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 20:47, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Centering is ok for a field, but not so much for the options in that field. Better they align left. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 20:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
That it is, that it is, but it also gets rid of the annoying empty inbetween space caused by center aligning. It's ok to center if your different sections are titled up top. Doing it with side-placed titles causes the fileds with a smaller number of options to get stuck in the middle. Works better when it's right next to the field. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs)

[edit] "Arc Significance"

First off, like I said in my edit summary, "Arc Significance" implies that the arc is either complete or entirely contained in that episode. Second, Capitalizing the s in significance is wrong, though it's a moot point. Third, "Significance in arc" works much better because it clearly relates the episode's significance to that of the overall arc.

Also, picking an arbitray point and saying "this is how it goes" won't work. Not every episode article has to look and work exactly the same, and most articles don't. There will always be variation. I, for one, would prefer to work with wording and styling that is perfectly clear rather than strictly adhere to the rules of a nearly dead wikiproject. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 23:21, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] TV Barnstar

No problem! The barnstar proposal by User:TrackerTV was inactive for two days that I just needed a "boost". So then I just sent messages to all of the TV related WikiProjects.--Ed 20:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

The debate seems to be pointing to Image#4. Look at the discussion here and tell me what you think.--Ed 17:57, 3 August 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Vanished

I'm adding categories for all Vanished articles, including one each for the actors and characters. Robert Moore 02:53, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair Use Deletions

I was messaged several times by some well meaning folks and some robots. Some folks have questioned a few photos I uploaded from press kits and labelled as fair use. I think on the whole that it is just better if I leave the photo uploading to those who know better. I took down their messages not because they weren't appreciated, but because they were red and unsightly. They can be seen in the history of this article should someone be dying to read them.Transcendentalstate 17:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thank You

You are the nicest person on Wikipedia, myself included. Thank you Ice9Tea 00:19, 17 April 2007 (UTC)



[edit] AfD nomination of Emily Sullivan

I have nominated Emily Sullivan, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Sullivan. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Magioladitis (talk) 06:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)