User talk:Trampled

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feel free to leave any comments/complaints, I will respond as soon as I can.
Leave a new message
Archive 1

Contents

[edit] Your signature

Trampled, your signature is broken on the Genius talk page. James_Aguilar (talk) 06:08, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Images and media for deletion votes

  • I am contacting people who previously helped to vote to delete a generally objectionable photograph by a vote of 88 to 21, and who might be unaware that immediately after that image was voted to be deleted someone posted another which was very similar in content. My objections to this, and the previous image that was voted to be deleted might be based upon reasons far different from any that you have, but I do object to it, and consider the posting of such images to be acts of asinine stupidity, which burdens the project and its major educational aims in ways that they should not be burdened, and can be extremely detrimental to the acceptance and growth of WIkipedia's use and influence. Thus far those who I believe to be in the extreme minority of Wikipedians who would like to include these images, many who have been channeled to the voting page from the article with which it is associated have dominated the voting, 23 to 12 (as of the time that I composed this message). I would like to be somewhat instrumental in shedding a bit more light upon the issue, and if possible, helping to turn the tide against its inclusion. It might also be necessary to begin making an effort to establish an explicit Wikipedia policy against explicite photographic depictions of humans engaged in erotic, auto-erotic, or quasi-erotic activities. To my limited knowledge such images have not been accepted as appropriate anywhere else within this project, and frankly I can agree with those who are casually labeled prudes for opposing their inclusion, that they should not be. Vitally important information that might be unwelcome by some is one thing that should never be deleted, but un-needed images that can eventually prevent or impede many thousands or millions of people from gaining access to the great mass of truly important information that Wikipedia provides is quite another. There are vitally important distinctions to be made. Whatever your reasons, or final decisions upon the matter, I am appealing for more input on the voting that is occurring at Wikipedia:Images_and_media_for_deletion ~ Achilles † 21:18, 6 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] My adminship: thanks!

Hi Trampled. Thanks very much for your vote for my RfA. I promise to be prudent, wise, sagacious and totally unilateral in all my admin affairs. I should say that I am very pleased at the number of people who supported me – it's very nice to know I'm making a positive impact. Cheers again, Smoddy (Rabbit and pork) 21:12, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Ah, thanks for the help

I poked around for a while trying to figure out how to link to my user page, but I gave up after 10 minutes. Thanks! Liface 22:10, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SomethingAwful

I was about to say "Because it was flat false" but you made me think about it and I realized I got it backwards. Whoops. :/ --Golbez 06:58, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Masturbation

I hope you do not consider this a violation of the request at the top of your page. I consider this a question of editing, not about a fight with any particular user. Would you care to register an opinon on the Masturbation Talk page as to whether a full color photograph of male masturbation is suitable for that page? Thank you. Force10 22:24, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] SAF + AYB

Thank you. I've responded on that talk page [1] .--Etaonish 01:27, May 23, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Oops!

Sorry, didn't know signatures shouldn't have pictures. :) Will change ASAP, thanks!

How's this? Flcelloguy| Give me a note! | Desk 21:47, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Cost curve images

I really like the images you made to illustrate the cost curves article! Could you upload higher-resolution versions of the images (possibly even in a vector format)? That would make the pictures more scalable and better-looking if printed. Thanks! --bdesham ★ 16:39, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] zero37 are you there?

I'm trying to contact Leo


[edit] Image:AtwaterKentFront.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AtwaterKentFront.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 15:36, 2 November 2006 (UTC)