User talk:Trainmoney

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, Trainmoney, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Llamadog903 13:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Moving article

Please never ever move articles without first asking at talk. This creates too much trouble for others. Thanks, --Irpen 02:27, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Muscowy/Russia

Hi. I've tried fixing your move from Russian to Muscovite Tsardom, something I still have to learn how to do properly, but thankfully the wiki-experts stepped in. I don't understand the reasoning behind what you did. Please use the talk page for something that big first. 205.250.213.33 03:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Speedy deletion of Dirty Diana (band)

A tag has been placed on Dirty Diana (band), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. -- Sander Säde 17:00, 27 October 2007 (UTC)


[edit] No content in Category:Glam punk

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Glam punk, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Glam punk has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Glam punk, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


  • Hi User:Bloomfield or however you'd wish to identify yourself. I just wanted to let you know that in general your contributions to English WP have been useful. They require sometimes a lot of clean up and rewriting according to published sources. But the point is, if you could stick to the facts only and not get carried away with personal interpretations + using the sockpuppeting of course has been a problem, I think you could become a valuable contributor. So please let me know, do you wish to participate in this project by sticking to the facts only and by dropping the sockpuppetry. You'd be always welcome to ask in case you can't find a proper sources to cite or don't know exactly how anything is called in English. That would include you to drop things like "Elderships" etc. since the conventional term for political structure was called Council of Elders. Also, you'd need to drop attempting to show any political formations such as Kingdom of Livonia or the United Baltic Duchy as former countries since those states were never established and conventional history treats these as such, attempts to establish states, not anything that could be looked at as established former countries or etc. So, please let me know if you'd wish to get rehabilitated, if you're willing to use just one account , work together with other editors and contribute to WP according to published sources only not according to your personal interpretations? Please respond at my talk page. Thanks!--Termer (talk) 20:58, 27 December 2007 (UTC)