Talk:Travis McCoy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive: 1

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Travis McCoy article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

[edit] Travis McCoys' wife

Everyone keeps saying that Travis McCoy is single, but there is a video on YouTube of him with his wife. It doesn't look like a hoax. Divorced? Anybody know? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.32.183.179 (talk) 23:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Anons have changed this article every fews weeks with a new girlfriend, fiance, or wife. I won't believe anything without a very solid reference. Royalbroil 23:59, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Schleprok?

Why does every time Travis is referenced on wikipedia Schleprok or a.k.a. schleprok comes up too? Is this even noteworthy? Does it need to appear on every article? It's said a few times in Papercut Chronicles, but not enough to warrant a motif, like the band-aids or papercuts.Michael Cook (talk) 19:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Pictures

Is it needed to have two pictures of him? I think only the lower one should be used, even though his face isn't as clear, the top one is not very good IMO, due to the eyes...Fadsfaslkfhsdkfh (talk) 08:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

I like the top picture better, which is newer. There's enough room for both, even on a wide screen monitor. Royalbroil 12:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)