Talk:Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Philosophy Portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Philosophy, which collaborates on articles related to philosophy. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.
Additional information: Related task forces (core areas): Logic Related task forces (major fields): Philosophy of religion

	Transcendental argument for the non-existence of God is part of WikiProject Atheism, which aims to organize, expand, clean up, and guide atheism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
For more information and how you can help click Show → If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page for more details. Quick help: See changes to: Main talk page Article layout Links to Atheism information and Wikipedia:Research resources Writing about religion and Article development Citing sources, Verifing Sources and Original research Assume good faith and be civil Core articles Atheism article New atheism articles To Do List: edit - history - watch - purge Join WikiProject atheism and be bold Show off a userbox with {{userWPA}} or {{userWPA2}} and attract potential members Help with articles. See this month's adopt an article. Help out with the To-do lists Be consistent Use a "standard" layout for atheism related articles (see: atheism layout style, The perfect article, and Featured articles) Add Atheism navigation template on the bottom of all atheism articles; (use {{Atheism}} or see navigation template) Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{Wpa}} or see info box) Add {{Category:atheism}} to the bottom of all atheism related articles, so it shows up on the list of atheism articles Maintenance / Etc Find/cite sources for all positions of an article (see citing sources, and atheism references). Try to expand stubs, however, some "new" articles may be neologisms, as this is common with positions on theories on life and may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process) Watch the list of atheism related articles and add to accordingly (see atheism articles) And always write for an encyclopedia. Article to improve for the month of November Agnosticism Create Notable atheist articles Shorten / merge into others false choice into false dilemma - discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Expand an atheism stub Your immediate attention false choice into false dilemma - discuss whether you are for or against this merge here Clarify references in Atheism, using footnotes.

I duly object to the change of name for this page. My original title had the capitals as originally intended by Michael Martin. Franc28 04:44, May 11, 2005 (UTC)

The words "necessary" and "contingent" and their usage here are confusing. Are they similar to "absolute" and "relative" or "objective" and "subjective" or something similar? Also, the argument concerning morality is unpersuasive. Unless I misunderstand, it claims that the Christian worldview is false because there is disagreement as to what God's will among religious authorities.

The words necessary and contingents have accepted meanings in philosophy. I don't see why this should be confusing in this particular case : it's a fairly straightforward argument. If divine creation is true, then all material facts are contingent to a god's will.

The argument on morality has two parts, one of which is the one you mentioned. The other is that divine creation makes moral facts such as "gratuitous cruelty is evil" contingent on God's will, which is wholly unacceptable within the Christian assumption of moral objectivity (as well as the secular position of moral objectivity, which IMHO is the only tenable position). Franc28 04:26, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:31, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Please check for accuracy.

Am I mistaken or in the following text is the phrase "Quantum entanglement" incorrect?

"On L5 some thinkers, like John Polkinghorne point out that "obvious contradictions" often happen in science and suggest that we should not overestimate our abilities in this area. Quantum entanglement allows particles to pass through a slit and not pass through a slit at the same time."

It would seem that the author meant to say "Interference".