User talk:TR Wolf

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:BandQ.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BandQ.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:44, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] B&Q confusion

I noticed that here you deleted a comment from the Home Depot article about B&Q not being related. They are in fact not related at all, despite the similarities, so I've added additional language to remove the confusion entirely. See also my comments on the Talk:The_Home_Depot page. Also, when you make such changes please be sure to fill in the "edit summary" field, especially when you think you are fixing a factual inaccuracy. That allows others to more easily notice and make a greater effort to validate the change. -- Bovineone 07:06, 5 March 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Bill Hicks pic retouched

Hi Tr, if you could upload the improved Bill Hicks pic here Putfile.com then I can copy-paste it & that would be better for me.
[Wiki's putfile info]
I'm reluctant to put my email address on public display, what with all the nuts and spammers and spamming nutters, etc. It's a very handy service they offer 100%, I'd rec signing up. (25mb of upload space per member.. upload pics, audio and video) cheers Dirk Diggler Jnr 02:36, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Monkey Island and 'original research'

Please see my discussion in the talk page of Monkey Island series about if references of PotC should be mentioned. I'd like your input.

[edit] Welcome

Welcome, TR Wolf!

I noticed your work on Tongue-twister, and thought I'd welcome you to Wikipedia. My name is Dan, a.k.a. Audacity. Thank you for your contributions, and I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Some other hints and tips:

  • Since you have created a username, you have the privilege of customizing your own user page, which is here. You can also tell us more about yourself at Wikipedia:New user log.
  • When using talk pages, please sign your name at the end of your messages by typing four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date.

If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Or come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

Thanks again for contributing to Wikipedia. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian.

Λυδαcιτγ 03:37, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Uh.. Im not quite new, but thanks anyway, that was a pleasant message. TR_Wolf

[edit] License tagging for Image:Llandudno.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Llandudno.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:06, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Ozlondon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ozlondon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:FatherchristmasNarnia.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FatherchristmasNarnia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi TR. It's a nice image, but it's going to be deleted very soon unless you can provide information to demonstrate that it's not a copyright infringement. Where did it come from? I see from the discussion above that several images you've posted have been tagged as possible copyright infringements; if you need any help on what you need to do, or on what's allowable or what's not, please feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Regards. --MichaelMaggs 11:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Frank.jpeg

Thanks for uploading Image:Frank.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I'm not a bot, and also came here concerned about Frank's licensing. It's a great picture, but "used with permission" is not sufficient to be kept, and may in fact conflict with the GFDL. It'd be a shame to have to delete the image, so if you can provide information on its source that would be great. LWizard @ 01:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned fair use image (Image:Ozlondon.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ozlondon.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. MECU≈talk 03:37, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Where is Reebok Stadium?

Where did you get your OFFICIAL information about Reebok Stadium in Lostock?
The Middlebrook site is situated either side of the boundary between Horwich and Lostock. Reebok Stadium is just on the Lostock side of the boundary, however, the Royal Mail gives the OFFICIAL address as:

Bolton Wanderers Football Club
Reebok Stadium
Burnden Way
Horwich
Bolton
BL6 6JW

Before anying was built there, the site was farmland for Sefton Fold Farm in Horwich, which stretched over into Lostock.
Take a look the modern maps at http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/, and type BL6 6JW (Reebok Stadium) and zoom in, you'll find the plain dotted line (just north of the stadium) shows the Horwich/Lostock boundary which runs through Middlebrook. (Don't look at the green lines, they're footpaths).
Or have a look at Lostock's old township boundaries http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/LAN/Lostock/ParishMap.shtml which shows the real Lostock that stretches over to Regent Road and Chew Moor.
You might also notice that the the Beehive/Alexandra Rd/Fall Birth Rd area is in Horwich, but the Royal Mail puts that area as in Lostock.
So it works out that the Royal Mail puts Reebok Stadium, postally, in Horwich, yet part of Horwich is put, postally, in Lostock.
No wonder that people are confused. Cwb61 20:30, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pete Burns

He looks horrific? Hmm. That is a matter of opinion, judging by the deadoralive.net forums. They're crazy.80.43.72.100 21:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Well if they're fans of his, they'll be biased wont they? I think he looks horrible now, like a cheap mutilated drag queen. TR_Wolf

Apart from on some of the re-touched pictures.

[edit] Invitation to join WP:LGBT

Hi! I was wondering if you were interested in joining the LGBT WikiProject? Take a look around, and if you're interested, sign up - we'd love to have your participation! -- SatyrBot 05:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] License tagging for Image:FGSteve.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FGSteve.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:08, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] images

Your images were licensed for Wikipedia or non-commercial use only. Please note that the images cannot be used on Wikipedia because they are not released under the GFDL licence as required. Wikipedia images can be used for any purpose by anyone, including commercial use. To protect the copyright holder's rights, they have to be deleted. If the copyright holder agrees to effectively allow any use, including coommercial, they can be re-uploaded, but you will have to be able to demonstate that the copyright holder agrees to this. jimfbleak 19:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] huh?

Couldnt you just of added that under discussion, instead of editing my page (You're really mistaken about M&S uniforms and temp staff.).

Stingerblue 01:27, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Frank.jpeg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Frank.jpeg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Iamunknown 05:02, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:KerryElphaba3.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:KerryElphaba3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Videmus Omnia 23:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

==Fair use rationale for Image:Guybrush.jpg==

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Guybrush.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 06:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Patro.jpg

Greetings. I'm a bit confused. I found the same image at http://www.jamesruncie.com/docs/film_pym.html. Are you actually the photographer? --Gmaxwell 19:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

I took that particular one, but none others from Miss Pym’s Day Out TR 19:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gay Pride edits

Hi, you need to revisit those edits. The sentence doesn't flow (or even make sense) with the article and the link doesn't seem to work. Benjiboi 12:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Pirates of Penzance

Hello. I like the image of the modern production of Pirates, but it belongs down where we discuss modern versions. The classic image at the top of the article is a better representation of this Victorian theatre classic. If you like G&S, please join WP:G&S write some new articles for us, or help add references to existing articles within the scope of the project? Best regards, and have fun with your production of Pirates. -- Ssilvers 20:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:KerryElphaba3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:KerryElphaba3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:39, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:KerryElphaba3.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:KerryElphaba3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:42nd.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:42nd.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 13:33, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] =THE HOOBS ARE DEATH METAL!!!

I don't know where you got the idea as where you could revert the hoobs article and say I "vandalized" it. The Hoobs ARE death metal! I KNOW FOR A FACT! I HAVE ONE OF THEIR CDS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobofet11 (talk • contribs) 18:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hello!
Hello, TR Wolf! Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's Greater Manchester-related articles. Given the interest we're assuming you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Greater Manchester? It's a user-group dedicated to improving the overall quality of all Greater Manchester-related content. There is a discussion page for sharing ideas as well as developing and getting tips on improving articles. The project has in-house specialists to support and facilitate your ideas. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants.


If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We hope to be working with you in the future!

└and-rew┘┌talk┐ 01:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rowanatkinson.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Rowanatkinson.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 22:52, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Springer Synopis

You have had the reasons why this cannot be used explained to you several times. Do not replace the material again, or you will be blocked from editing. You may continue to discuss this on the talk page if you must, but this material is not compliant with wikipedia's policies.. Now, knock it off.--Docg 23:10, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

I see no reason the synopsis should not be used, I wrote to Stuart Lee and got his permission to use it in the article, I've said it can be edited, just not to insert meaningless fluff, or to previous editors, not to edit inserting bias and the such TR (talk) 23:14, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
In which case, BEFORE it can be used, you'll need to get the copyright holder to e-mail "permissions-en AT wikimedia DOT org" and confirm the release of the text under the GFDL. A WP:OTRS volunteer will then certify receipt of this on the talk page, and then it can be used. However, it can be edited, abridged, removed, or amended in any way as any other wikipedia text. Until that is done it cannot be used.--Docg 23:23, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Moroever, the restrictions you outlined i.e. "not to insert meaningless fluff" and "not to edit inserting bias and the such" are not compatible with the GFDL. Whilst Wikipedia would not want such additions, the GFDL does not itself address content. The reason for this is that by licensing under the GFDL, you expressly give permission for anyone to reuse the content for any purpose whatsoever (including commercial purposes and purposes of which the original author may not approve), provided that the source is attributed and the license remains free. CIreland (talk) 23:30, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Copyright problems

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Image:UKJUSTICE.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Image:UKJUSTICE.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Image:UKJUSTICE.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Image:UKJUSTICE.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Image:UKJUSTICE.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Image:UKJUSTICE.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. One Night In Hackney303 03:01, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:FGZoe.png‎

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. One Night In Hackney303 07:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Galaxychocolate.jpg}

Thank you for uploading Image:Galaxychocolate.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:33, 24 April 2008 (UTC)