Talk:Trịnh Lords

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 WikiProject Southeast Asia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Southeast Asia, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Southeast Asia-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as start on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.

Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
It is requested that a photograph or photographs be included in this article to improve its quality.
The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

[edit] Hán tự

Need citation for (i.e., was this the way this group of rulers was written in Sino-Vietnamese characters)? Badagnani (talk) 18:17, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

It seems to be the right set of characters for Chúa Trịnh, according to the characters given by the Nom Foundation's database. Badagnani (talk) 18:18, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The word "Chúa" is a possible reading of the character 主. However, the term 主鄭 doesn't follow Chinese syntax and probably wouldn't be used in an official context. 鄭主 seems more likely. DHN (talk) 18:22, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The instances I found seem to be on "unofficial" websites like discussion forums. One would think there would be a construction like 鄭主 in the old sources, but a Google search doesn't give such a name as conclusively as it does for the other, more "normal" dynasties. Badagnani (talk) 18:37, 29 January 2008 (UTC)