Talk:Toyota Aurion/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Vandalising

Whoever it is that is vandalising this article, please don't do it.

Alphabeta777 09:36, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup

I think this article is need of some attention; for starters, it has no introduction paragraph, and it's a bit hard to read because it's somewhat repetitive at times. --ApolloBoy 08:22, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Now the article looks OK. Thanks again Boivie! --ApolloBoy 06:35, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
Some of the tenses need to be cleaned up as well. The Aurion is out, and yet some sections still refer to "will be", or similar (in some cases this is true, eg: upcoming variants, but particularly in the Development section, this uses an old tense). 59.167.142.74 16:43, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

front wheel drive or all wheel drive?

what source do you have that the TRD aurion will be only front wheel drive? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PAuLw1985 (talkcontribs) 02:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC).

Well toyota hasn't told us any differently so until they do it's a fairly safe assumption 149.167.29.99 22:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
I hear that it will be awd. Downunda 05:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Makes sense, 250kw through the front wheels is a bit daft. I hope it isn't as boring as the normal Aurion is =\ Comradeash 00:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I think the Aurion TRD will be front-wheel drive. It seems a Toyota spokesman confirmed it here. It's an old article but a more recent one still points to it being FWD.[1] This will make it one of the most powerful FWD cars in production. I personally have doubts on handling but I'll reserve judgement. VectorD 11:00, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
likewise, given that the current one handles like a pile of crap if you push it --220.253.153.195 01:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Citing references

Sorry, I don't know how to cite stuff. But here are the links in order of where "citation needed" is.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/news/now-its-round-two-for-toyota/2006/02/09/1139465785084.html - all ready has been referenced

http://www.mellor.net/mellor/enews.nsf/edition/EB2772816ADDFDA5CA25710F002CB5F7/$file/GoAuto_enews322.pdf - all ready has been referenced

For the last tag, these three weblinks.

http://www.toyota.com.ph/cars/new_cars/index.asp

http://www.toyota.com.tw/vehicle/vehicle_index.asp?CategoryID=216

http://www.toyota.com.cn/vehicles/camry/index.html - all are irrelevent to the topic

Alphabeta777 13:17, 3 August 2007 (UTC)