Talk:Toxin (comics)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

comics
Portal

This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. Please rate the article and provide comments here.

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

More information:

	This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: `<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. -->` `\|B-Class-1=yes/no` `<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. -->` `\|B-Class-2=yes/no` `<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->` `\|B-Class-3=yes/no` `<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->` `\|B-Class-4=yes/no` `<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. -->` `\|B-Class-5=yes/no`
Related task forces (publisher):
	Marvel Comics work group

Toxin should not be classed an an anti-hero, in that he has strict morals that do not break any laws (except of course, being a vigilante.).

Have you read the Wiki for anti-hero? It's a very broad category, ranging from Homer Simpson to The Punisher to Gatsby. It seems that any flawed character cast in a main character role could be considered an anti-hero. --Anon80
He doesn't exactly fit into any of those categories-He's a traditional hero, no more an anti-hero than Spider-man.

Yes, Spider-Man is an anti-hero, his heroic acts come from guilt, and his character is flawed.T-1000 02:37, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

I wouldnt say that, exactly... I would say that Spider-Man does what he does because of what he learned, not out of guilt. It may seem like guilt but its more because he learned that with great power comes great responsibility and, thus, he needed to fill that roll. I could so how it could be identified as guilt, but I would never go so far as to say that.

1 Chainwebs?
2 1000th symbiote?
3 The Initiative
4 Toxin's wife
5 Speed of transformation
6 In other media
7 Fair use rationale for Image:TOXIN0101.jpg
8 Fair use rationale for Image:TOXIN3.jpg
9 Fair use rationale for Image:Toxin5.jpg
10 Fair use rationale for Image:ToxinTantrum.png

[edit] Chainwebs?

Shouldn't they be cited as a referance to Spawn, since Todd McFarlane created both Spawn and Venom? (yes, I know he CO created venom) Jackpot Den 00:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

I would agree, it seems to me the "chainwebs" would be an homage to former Spiderman artist, and Venom co-creator Todd McFarlane, and his creation Spawn, which he has admitted was influenced by Spiderman. -rex 19 June 2006

Can anyone cite either? They don't really look that much like chains to me...--Viridis 10:12, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 1000th symbiote?

I was reading Toxin's comic, and I remember Venom saying something about him being the 998th symbiote in his line, Carnage the 999th, and Toxin the 1000th, and the 1000th symbiote had more potential to make it's host go insane, or something like that. That's another reason he wanted to train Toxin. I don't remember the exact details though. Can anyone verify this, and does anyone think it should be noted on the main page?24.19.62.17 19:36, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Initiative

The article says that Toxin is on the cover of the the Avengers: The Initiative. While there is a red symbiote on the cover, it has not been confirmed as Toxin and really has more of a resemblence to Carnage than Toxin.

It's been confirmed as Toxin, now.--Viridis^{talk|contributions} 01:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Also on that point, how does Carnage's apparent demise have any link to Toxin joining the Initiative with Venom? Venom was the one who enlisted Carnage to help bash Toxin's brains out in Venom vs Carnage.

Actually, Venom initially wanted to protect Toxin and later even gave him that name. Carnage was the one who wanted Toxin dead the whole time. I myself never saw this cover, though, so I couldnt tell you who it was.

Yes, and then he teamed up with Carnage after he saw Toxin was strong and good. I guess we'll have to read the Initiative.--Viridis^{talk|contributions} 01:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

That was the Eddie Brock version of Venom; The Mac Gargan version may feel differently. Bluecatcinema 13:31, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Toxin's wife

Did Toxin really introduce his wife to the symbiote? I read the series and the Toxin series and I really don't remember it.

Yes, at the very end. They were talking in a coffeshop and he wanted to explain why he walked out on her before. He said something like "promise not to freak out, ok?" and then it cut away, showing the outside of the coffeeshop and showing her scream. It's assumed that means he showed her the symbiote.

Sign your posts!--Viridis^{talk|contributions} 01:31, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speed of transformation

I saw in the comic that Patrick comments "It only takes a minute or two...from human to symbiote"

This indicates it takes him a few minutes to have his costume cover him, as opposed to Venom and Carnage, who appear to be able to have their costumes cover them instantly. Should this be noted somewhere in the article?

[edit] In other media

Patrick Mulligan appeared briefly in Spider-Man 3; he was seen in the background during the final battle, in the scene where J. Jonah Jameson bought a camera from the little girl. Mulligan was credited in the end credits as "Pat Mulligan". He was played by Crispin Glover.

OK, 1) I don't remember this in the movie, 2) Crispin Glover doesn't have Spider-Man 3 anywhere on his imdb page, and 3) Spider-Man 3 doesn't have Crispin Glover anywhere on it's imdb page. I think this should be removed. 64.241.230.3 18:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TOXIN0101.jpg

Image:TOXIN0101.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:25, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:TOXIN3.jpg

Image:TOXIN3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:26, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Toxin5.jpg

Image:Toxin5.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:ToxinTantrum.png

Image:ToxinTantrum.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)