Talk:Tourism in Peru
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Fine article
Fine article.--Wloveral (talk) 03:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Image sizes
To the user who changed the image sizes (User:Ericbronder) and to whoever else it may concern: According to the user who changed the image sizes he did so adhering to Wikipedia:MOS however this page clearly states that:
- "It is inappropriate for an editor to change an article from one style to another unless there is a substantial reason to do so"
- "an article has been stable in a given style, it should not be converted without a reason that goes beyond mere choice of style"
- "When it is unclear whether an article has been stable, defer to the style used by the first major contributor"
- "Image size is a matter of preference"
1. There is no substansial reason to change the image size
2. The article is stable as it is so it should not be converted based on this user's choice
3. I am the first major contributor and I think it is stable
4. The image size suits the article well as the 180px size are to small to be viewable
Vivaperucarajo (talk) 16:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm... MOS:IMAGES states that image size is a matter of preference but also that specifying the size of a thumbnail image is not necessary. It then goes on to list a series of cases in which a specific image size might be required. In this case, the article has a lot of images in relation to the text, to the point that images stack-up which is something WP:MOS discourages. As a consequence, it is difficult to ensure that images remain aligned to the relevant sections at all resolutions, specially at the lower ones such as 800x600. For this reason I think we should remove image sizes. --Victor12 (talk) 19:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)