From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TorstenGuise.
|
Vandalism information
Low to moderate level of vandalism. [update]
Less than 100 edits/minute to begin with... only ~5 reverts/minute. Still some though. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 05:39, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
TorstenGuise
|
This user contributes using a Mac, and doesn't know why Windows was ever invented.
|
|
[edit] Hello There
Hey there, I'm an physicist and engineer living in Manchester in the UK. I've been an editor here since early 2006, and been a newpage patroller since May 2007. I'm also a musician.
[edit] Wiki Likes
I'm an inclusionist, so I like the expansion of wikipedia. I'm all for more content. I've written articles myself, and that to me is what Wikipedia is all about. Sharing the knowledge. Trouble is that I'm getting feed up of the abuse of the inclusionist philosophy that has become more and more rife here. that's why I've joined AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD
[edit] Minor Wiki Hates
Only two really. Vandalism, and advertising. Vandalism can be a funny thing, and I've seen some very funny satirical examples, but Wikipedia isn't the place for it. Thats why I'm in the Counter Vandalism Unit. If you want Satire and silliness, then check out Uncyclopedia.
It's a well known fact that most articles on Wikipedia that are related to an entity are written by the people involved. In most cases this is acceptable (charities, non-profitmaking societies and the like). However I hate it when companies and websites just want to use Wikipedia as a free advertising hoarding. I won't hesitate to mark these for speedy deletion.
[edit] BIG Hates
International editors not understanding the relevant situations and taking the guidelines as defacto.
Editors manipulating the system to selfishly push their own point of view onto other wikipedia users
BOTS - Need I say any more!
Finally, there are some users, mostly from the United States of America, who have had a problem with me correcting them about the usage of the English Language, and also facts on Wikipedia that have been bent by users to support their own, and not a neutral point of view, to an extent of changing articles mid-debate to back their own argument. As a result of this, I have been accused of being in a cabal, Sockpuppetry, Meatpuppetry and had administrator-level investigations into my actions (to which I have been aquitted every time, and the malicious nature of the accusation noted). Just because I am supported in a debate by other users does not mean that they are in such a cabal, or Meatpuppets, that's not what any editor worth his salt is here for. We're here for the greater good of wikipedia, and not to score brownie points by editing for the sake of editing and having the best user page ever. After all, Wikipedia is an occasional hobby. I still have a life!
I'm not as selective on my patrols anymore as I've started using WP:TWINKLE
If I mark a page for speedy deletion, and you don't agree, then contest it. An administrator will not delete a page marked for speedy deletion if there is enough evidence to justify it.
DON"T remove the banner yourself. This is something that the banner says you personally are NOT to do. I watch pages once I've marked them, and will happily replace banners that are removed.
I'm now armed with wikiguard, so vandals, watch out!!