Talk:Toronto waterfront

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
Ontario
This article is part of the Ontario WikiProject (Discuss/Join).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toronto, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Toronto articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Isn't saying the Gardiner Expressway is an obstacle just an opinion? One could also argue that the Gardiner is what's keeping the downtown core alive, as it is the only highway into downtown.

Hey, and what about project that were proposed to make the waterfront more attrative? Like the Olympics and Toronto's bid for the 2015 World's Fair?

What is with the picture? That is not even in Toronto!

Actually, it is. It's a picture of a semi-private boardwalk just west of Humber Bay Park. Not the most representative picture but technically correct. Atrian 17:00, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps a more suitable picture could be located and inserted.

Suitable? The Humber is part of Toronto's history! Ever since Etienne Brule set foot on what would become Toronto in 1615! That's right. I went there. (David McIntyre)

[edit] POV

There are a number of apparent problems with this article as it stands, most significantly are some passages of POV-ness along with a lack of citations in some parts:

  • "Brian Mulroney called a yet again another Royal Commission"
  • "leading to an ever worsening Corporate position"
  • "long a source of much disdain due to the perceived detachment factor"

etc, etc.

There also appear to be some technical issues, along with a bit of spam. Rtucker 01:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)