Talk:Top One Percent Society

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Top One Percent Society article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is part of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of education and education-related topics. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to featured and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.
Portal
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Contents 1 Article lacks citations

[edit] Article lacks citations

Rather than get into an edit war, I'll just leave this note for Someone Else ... this article lacks WP:RS citations to satisfy WP:N, specifically WP:ORG, and what distinguishes it from Mensa International is that Mensa is so notable that there is no need to cite articles that are devoted to it (in fact, it's publication, Mensa Bulletin, is cited as a RS in several Wikipedia articles) ... contrast this with Prometheus Society, which only survived an AfD by the expansion of citations (see the References section) ... at least now this article has been tagged with {{unreferenced}} to show that it is lacking verification of notability, just like Triple Nine Society and several others ... OTOH, there is a Category:Wikipedians in the Triple Nine Society, so that article probably won't remain tagged for very long. —68.239.79.97 (talk · contribs) 13:04, 5 April 2007 (UTC)