User talk:Tonywalton/Mar-Apr-2006
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] German immigration to Puerto Rico
Thank you buddy! What do you think of the article so far? Tony the Marine 15:50, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] STOP IT
STOP SCREWING UP MY ARTCLES IT DOES HAVE SIGNIFIGANCE --Craffe 14:44, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
SEMPER FIDELIS! WILL DO.
-
- Exformation.info 16:39, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The PCD talk page
I did not blank that page to cover up my defacing, that i openly admit. i did it to cover up my admission that "the school's administration hates freedom". my school is run by a bunch of beauracratic nut jobs, in case you haven't noticed by them wanting the page removed.--Samael775 02:21, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for my first ever message on my usertalk page! DaMaul 15:58, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Thanks
Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! Yankees76 16:53, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Cheers
Cheers for correcting the title of my page - wasn't sure how to capitalise the surname. Ah well, I'll learn! Paddyk 15:54, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 6700 BC
Tony, that entire page is a joke - there is no more evidence for the Xia dynasty of China, yet if that can be considered unification, then speculative dates proposed by Indian nationalist historians can also be - 6700 should be left just as it is.
[edit] Deletion?
Well Tony, considering that there is as much historical evidence, I fail to see why?
Surely if you are willing to humor Chinese speculation, you should be willing to humor Indian speculation - the fact is nationalists in India have as much evidence for that date as natioanlists in China. This dosent alter my opinion that the article is a joke, but mearly turns it into a better researched joke - perhaps I should also add Iraq to that list, seeing as the Sumarians date back about as far?
The Kashmiri calendar I mentioned, not to mention the scholarship, is no less authorative than a semi-mythological Chinese king's list that refers to a dynasty that probably only occupied a small settlement if they existed, and has no historical basis. See 'Underworld' by Graham Hancock, etc, not to mention Hindutva scholarship.
If you do not wish to subscribe to doubt standards, you must leave the date as 6700 BC, or the date of the Mehrgarh settlment, or at the very least change it to the speculative date of the Indus-Valley-Civilization, around 3500 BC.
- Apparently, after being thrashed out, the article was not deleted. I dont think it will be dying a gracefull death anytime soon, so it might as well be 'accurate'. I have changed the start date to the start of the IVC instead, seeing as the IVC was a single empire with a single standard of measurement, building, urban planning, administration, writing, and currency.
[edit] Royal Decree of Graces of 1815
Hey Tony, I remember that when we talked about my article German immigration to Puerto Rico you mentioned that you would like to know more about the Royal Decree of Graces of 1815. Well, I want you to know that I finally wrote the article. Take care, Tony the Marine 03:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Abortion / Ethics
I agree my article needs a lot of cleanup, but it is in fact an original Power Point presentation that I wrote for a school project, if you wish to delete it I don;t really minf, but I do feel hurt that you seem to think that it is not my own work. It is breaching no possible copyright laws whatsoever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwardandrewlane (talk • contribs)
[edit] Conflicting New Page Patrol
Looks like you're doing some good patrolling today. However, I keep clashing with you - could we co-ordinate our efforts somehow to avoid this and therefore increase productivity? Thanks. --Xyrael 16:49, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] PROD: Time shifted advertising
I think Time shifted advertising fails notability, not as nonsense. So I'm leaving the PROD you added alone. Google search for the exact phrase reveals at least one companies claiming to already do it - but it looks like a spyware company to me, so visit the link at your own risk.[1] A presumably different company had a different version of the technology back in 2000.[2]. If this does become a disputed deletion (I'm not watching that page), feel free to let me know. GRBerry 18:14, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
The author of that page has pulled the PROD tag. He/she has been attempting improvements. GRBerry 18:51, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Barnstar Awarded
You deserve it! Kukini 16:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Friendofthehose
He has been blocked indefinitely. --Woohookitty(meow) 09:27, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 |
Hi mate, if you're a fan of Aussie rules, I suggest you take a look at WikiProject AFL (join by adding your name to the list of participants) and the Australian rules football portal. Also take a look at Category:VFL/AFL players and feel free to drop me a line with any questions, or on the WP:AFL discussion page. Cheers! |
Rogerthat Talk 04:51, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
- Good to see a Pom interested in the sport - I'll let you in on an awesome site I found that has full replays (streaming) of just about every match - AFLVideo. It's an awesome resource for some of my overseas mates who get homesick and I hope you can enjoy it too. Cheers, Rogerthat Talk 10:09, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Phil and Fern
I'm considering moving this to Phil and Fern and redirecting to This Morning (television). It's definitely a speedy candidate as it stands. Any thoughts?
- If you want to create a redirect at Phil and Fern to This Morning (television) go ahead, don't confuse the issue by moving something there that's only going to be removed anyway. -- Francs2000
11:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The table demo
I took your advice and signed myself up for a Wikipedia account. I would have sent you a private message like you did me, but I couldn't figure it out for the life of me! Feel free to do whatever you want with it - this IS wikipedia, after all.
Thanks, Sam Arium 17:54, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
