User talk:Tony X Liu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "I am not the vandal! Shotwell is!"

Decline reason: "You clearly were vandalising/attempting to edit war without discussion. Wait for your block to expire. Also do not use the helpme template again."

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Shotwell keeps vandalising Tony Liuville theory. Please can someone ban him ASAP!!!!!--Tony X Liu 19:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)


[edit] User talk:Shotwell

I notice that you are blanking comments on the above talk page. You must not do this. Add comments by all means - but if you continue blanking comments, it is you who will be blocked. Whether anyone else will be blocked will depend on their edits. Ian Cairns 19:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blanking of test4 messages

I have reviewed your recent edits and notice that you have repeatedly blanked a test4 final warning. This referred to your vandalism of the Sturm-Liouville theory article. Please reconsider your actions while you are blocked and return with a fresh approach to editing Wikipedia articles. If not, then the next block will be longer, etc. Thanks, Ian Cairns 19:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Tony X Liu for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Loisel 22:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC)