User talk:Tony Mobily

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello Tony Mobily! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dirk Beetstra T C 10:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC) Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

[edit] Your question

I answered to your question on my talkpage (to keep the discussion in one place). Hope to see you around, have a nice day! --Dirk Beetstra ^{T C} 10:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] June 2007

[edit] Re: Concerning your messages on talk pages

Please sign your messages using four tildes (~~~~). Thank you. Nat Tang ^{talk to me! | Check on my contributions!|Email Me!} 15:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Homeopathy

Hi Tony. I'm going to write a longer reply to your post on Talk:Homeopathy, but I wanted to drop you a short note. I am willing to compromise on the lead criticism (and the other editors probably are too), but you should discuss on the talk page rather than reverting. Please read WP:3RR, if you haven't already. Thanks! Skinwalker 18:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

I have read WP:3RR. However, with this article I have seen numerous reverts with no explanation, and endless discussion with no resolution. I felt that in this case editing the page AND explaining why would be the only way to get anything to actually happen... which is sad.

May be you should try a new venue? (for inspiration) Not sure if it is any better, how does it look? David D. (Talk) 07:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the link David. I ding the article in Citizendium still a little biased, but it IS 100 better than Wikipedia's...

[edit] Science

Hey Tony,

Science has definitely been proven wrong many times but that's what's so great about it! I found this article (Scientific Method) really interesting and I think it'll help to explain how it's impossible for science to be biased against anything. I've often heard that science is just another religion. It's a view that's often pushed by people who believe in creationism or homeopathy and it shows a true lack of understanding of the scientific method. I really recommend reading it, its really neat stuff.Pdelongchamp 18:15, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk

Hey Tony,

I'm not too sure what you meant when you said you'd write about the value of wikipedia or reproducing the discussion but I wanted to let you know that it came off as a threat and I would advise against writing something like that in the future. The comments your were replying to were seriously laking in faith and I can understand why you were upset but it's always best to walk away or respond in good faith when replying to messages like that. Otherwise, things just go downhill. Let's ignore the last few comments and keep up the discussion. Other than this weekend, I think it's moving along well. Cheers. Pdelongchamp 17:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)