Talk:Tony Crane

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tony Crane article.

Article policies
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
WikiProject on Football The article on Tony Crane is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by the WikiProject on non-League football.
This article is supported by the England task force.
WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday
WikiProject Sheffield Wednesday
This article is supported by the WikiProject on Sheffield Wednesday, which is an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of articles relating to Sheffield Wednesday F.C. Please participate by editing the article Tony Crane, or visit the project page for more details.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

[edit] Notable

He has played professionally and is therefore notable. Mattythewhite 15:06, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

That's not right and you know it, because I've already explained it to you. Read WP:NOTE carefully.--Rambutan (talk) 15:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Please don't try and make me out to be a liar. Please read WP:BIO. It specifically states the criteria for notability of people for athletes as "Competitors who have played in a fully professional league, or a competition of equivalent standing in a non-league sport such as swimming or tennis". Mattythewhite 15:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
...all that plus WP:NOTE's criteria.--Rambutan (talk) 15:37, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Okay then. But I am very much against the deletion of content simply because its not "well enough referenced" and trivial reasons such as that. Mattythewhite 15:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
But that's policy.--Rambutan (talk) 15:46, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but saying because "its policy" or "its precedent" is hardly the right thing to do and fair thing to do. You could at least give the article time to be expanded rather than just get rid of it. Mattythewhite 15:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Am I bovvered? But seriously, it must be sourced. It's not up to you and it's not up to me, it is the rule.--Rambutan (talk) 15:55, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
Fair enough. My opinion is articles, like this, should at least be given a chance. Anyway, this article is now "definetley notable" I suppose and this discussion is hardly relevant to this article now. Mattythewhite 16:01, 3 September 2007 (UTC)