User talk:Tomtom9041
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
If you have a demonstrated history of personal harassment, your posts are not welcome here. (This includes certain "admins" who only got their position through sucking up.) You should know who you are. If you do post, your comments will be removed, most likely unread. If there's any chance that you might not know that your behavior is considered harassment, I will tell you, and from that point on you will not be allowed to post here. To anyone who doesn't know what I mean here, this warning does not apply to you, so by all means leave a message.(Borrowed from DreamGuy)
[edit] Welcome!
Hello Tomtom9041, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- KHM03 22:54, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Law enforcement in France
Hi, in Law enforcement in France you replaced "royal polices" with "royal police". It seems that each of the two kings of Futuna has a chief of police (which would mean there are two royal LEAs, or three if we add the king of Wallis, hence the plural), but I don't know if it's only an administrative title (in French law, "police" sometimes refers only to the fact of issuing administrative regulations) or if these chiefs also have law enforcement officers (I read that the local newspapers was raided by the police of the king of Wallis). Please tell me if you have more information. Thanks. Apokrif 13:41, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Jesus
I've asked you to explain our edit on the Jesus talk page. I'd love to hear from you.Gator (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
Just come on the Jesus page and explain the differences. Enough hostility and sarcasm please. I'm trying to be nice here. No more discussion on our talk apges, just come on the Jesus page and talk. PLEASE.Gator (talk) 17:20, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Philadelphia Request
Hi, I would appreciate you looking at this page and making some comments in favor of the merger.
Category talk:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Thanks! evrik 17:01, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- I'm going to second that request! South Philly 01:44, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging for Image:MercerMuseum.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:MercerMuseum.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:16, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image Tagging Image:PICT1669.JPG
|
Thanks for uploading Image:PICT1669.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stan 03:54, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
I did not upload the above picture.--Tomtom9041 17:56, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Median (disambiguation)
It seems to me that the Biblical sense of Median (the 3rd entry) is the same as the second sense of Median on the disambiguation page -- namely the Iranian people south of the Caspian that Cyrus captured in 550 BC. Is there a difference that I'm not aware of? Thanks, --jonsafari 01:58, 21 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Saints Wikiproject
I noted that you have been contributing to articles about saints. I invite you to join the WikiProject Saints. You can sign up on the page and add the following userbox to your user page.
This user is a member of the Saints WikiProject. |
Thanks! --evrik 19:27, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] "In abstentsia lucii, tenebrae vicii."
Just a correction, it should be: "In absentia lucis, tenebrae vincunt." Don't know where you took this one, but it was totally wrong ;) --giandrea 15:09, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Totally? Or just partly?--Tomtom9041 17:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Copy and paste move
Hello, Tomtom9041. Please do not copy and paste articles, like Spanish Legion, to move them. There is a move function at the top of the page. If a page already exists at the new name, you must make a move request. Copy and paste moves split the history of articles and they are difficult to repair. Thank you, Kjkolb 05:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Extraordinary rendition
Hi Tom could you please discuss on talk page before adding tags (i've deleted it as it makes articles look unprofessional). For your info Dr Rice has repeatedly admitted the process of Extraordinary rendition, she just claims that the victims of this are not tortured. Alleged has no place in this article, except when applied to specific cases that are ongoing with possible legal action.Hypnosadist 19:39, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Soviet imitations
I was very interested to see your list of Cold War imitations, a subject which fascinates me too. However, how many of these are parallel developments, I wonder? Certainly there are similarities between the Soviet Encyclopedia and Britannica, but they themselves are influenced/derived from elsewhere anyway (Britannica being based in Scotland originally), especially the French encyclopedia of the 18th century. Buran certainly looked like the American space shuttle, but I gather had some very different features. The "Concordski", on the other hand, looks and sounds very much like a clone. Nor was the influence entirely one way...
There is one other subject that I have brought up elsewhere, and never received a decent answer to. I have heard that the Soviets also developed an Internet of sorts, whether by direct imitation or simply by parallel thinking. Every time I have tried to find something out about this, I hit brick walls. I presume it was kept mainly under wraps, and used a very different operating system.
--MacRusgail 15:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Invite
You are invited to participate in WikiProject Philadelphia, a project dedicated to developing and improving articles about Philadelphia. We are currently discussing prospects for the project. Your input would be greatly appreciated! |
--evrik 19:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Philly meetup
Hi! There will be a Wikipedia Meetup in Philadelphia on 4 November. If you're interested in coming, RSVP by editing Wikipedia:Meetup/Philadelphia 2 to reflect the likelihood of your being able to attend. If you have any questions, feel free to ask CComMack's. Hopefully, we'll all see you (and each other) on the 4th! --evrik 19:46, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Honorable order of Major General West...
An honorable member of the Order of MG West and the lost cause it has become. |
[edit] Borrowings
The way you have now worded your page is acceptable. Of course, I cannot object if you genuinely believe the things that I believe. But I do think it important that you note whose words and experiences those are, as you have now done.
— Ford 19:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] What do you believe box
May I borrow this and credit you?--Tomtom9041 00:29, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Clairsamoht hasn't been on Wikipedia for quite some time. Waitak 00:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] 203.214.48.137
Fucking Redneck (this was posted by 203.214.48.137 on 03:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I am too!! And proud of it too!!!--Tomtom9041 00:36, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] List of countries by population edit
I know you meant well by moving the Regional Organizations out of the countries by population article, but actually the entire reason for this section's existence was to placate the people who insist the EU should be on the list. If the Regional Organizations are removed, the EU edit war starts anew. Malnova 08:10, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikimedia Pennsylvania
Hello there!
I'm writing to inform you that we are now forming the first local Wikimedia Chapter in the United States: Wikimedia Pennsylvania. Our goals are to perform outreach and fundraising activities on behalf of the various Wikimedia projects. If you're interested in being a part of the chapter, or just want to know more, you can:
- Contact us on IRC at #wikimedia-pa
- Join our mailing list
- Visit our blog at http://wmfpa.blogspot.com
Thanks and I hope you join up! Cbrown1023 talk 04:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Biblical Mount Sinai
Hi. Please see my comment at the talk page. Thanks. DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 05:10, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GNR
Thanks for the new disambig page.--71.185.193.98 02:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Guarda Nacional Republicana
Hi,
I noticed that you moved the page Republican National Guard to Portuguese National Republican Guard by copy-pasting its content. While I don't have anything against the title change, I have something against the method that you used. Because it didn't moved the original page's history along with the content. I would like to ask you to fix this, one way could be by requesting the deletion of the article Portuguese National Republican Guard, and then by moving Republican National Guard to the new title using MediaWiki's moving feature.
Also, I would like you to know that the GNR isn't a branch of the Portuguese Armed Forces.
Thank you for your help solving this.
Best regards, Get_It 04:02, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- According to their official website — GNR, A GNR, Historial:
“ | A Guarda Nacional Republicana, criada por Decreto de 3 de Maio de 1911, é uma força de Segurança constituída por militares organizados num Corpo Especial de Tropas dependendo em tempo de paz do Ministério da Administração Interna, para efeitos de recrutamento, administração e execução do serviço decorrente da sua missão geral, e do Ministério da Defesa Nacional para efeitos de uniformização e normalização da doutrina militar, do armamento e do equipamento; em caso de guerra ou em situação de crise, as forças da Guarda Nacional Republicana passarão a estar subordinadas ao Chefe do Estado-Maior General das Forças Armadas, quando nos termos da Lei estas forem colocadas na sua dependência para efeitos operacionais. | ” |
- That is, in peacetime the GNR depends on the Ministry of Internal Administration (MAI) for recruitment, administration and execution of their general mission, and also depends on the Ministry of National Defence for the uniformity of the military doctrine, armament and equipment. And, only, in wartime or in the case of a crisis situation the GNR will be under the command of the Chief-of-Staff of the Armed Forces. Has you can see this does not make them a branch of the Armed Forces.
Best regards, Get_It 15:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)- Regarding the USCG, it's not the same thing. It seems that the nearest thing to have the same status as the GNR is the Spanish Guardia Civil.
Best regards, Get_It 16:43, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
- Regarding the USCG, it's not the same thing. It seems that the nearest thing to have the same status as the GNR is the Spanish Guardia Civil.
[edit] Narcotics Control Bureau
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Narcotics Control Bureau, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://indiaimage.nic.in/ceib/ncb.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 23:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Narcotics Control Bureau
A tag has been placed on Narcotics Control Bureau, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g12.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. ViperSnake151 00:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] GFDL
Hi when you copy some text from a wikipedia project, as you did from the French wikipedia when creating Mobile Gendarmerie, you must give attribution in the edit summary. Also remember if you like you can ask for proof reading of your translation, especially if you used software to translate, as it is many cases incomprehensible. If you don't say where the article came from originally and leave incomprehensible sentences then it becomes more difficult for people to correct them. Jackaranga 09:04, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:User categories for discussion on -isms
Hi. A user category that you are in has been proposed for deletion at Wikipedia:User categories for discussion. You are welcome to comment. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:22, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- You're in the category, Category:Deist Wikipedians. The category is tied to the userbox - having the userbox puts you in it, so (in theory) others with an interest in Deism or a question about the substance of related articles will know where to find you, as you might know something about the topic. That is one of a bunch of categories that has been nominated for deletion in a mass nomination regarding all theological positions. Cheers again! bd2412 T 03:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
- These mass nominations have been started by some other editors - with whom I happen to disagree - at Wikipedia:User categories for discussion#Singular theological belief. That userbox on your user page that says "This user is interested in Deism" puts you in that category. I felt that it would be appropriate to let people in the category know that it was being considered for deletion. bd2412 T 03:14, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Notability of Earth Force (Environmental group)
A tag has been placed on Earth Force (Environmental group) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Carados (talk) 17:38, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] History of the sheriff
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article History of the sheriff, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}}
to the top of History of the sheriff. Kannie | talk 15:12, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Carabinieri Regiment "Tuscania"
I have been glad to see your very good translation of "my" article about Tuscania Rgt.".
I dared to put some small adjustments, begging in advance your pardon for my English (I'm Italian).
Bye, --Filippof (talk) 17:22, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Tuscania Rgt.
I'm glad to know you're a sort of "Carabinieri-friend"...
Actually, my father was a Carabinieri professional member, and I served in Carabinieri (as Leutenant) for 27 months.
Bye. --Filippof (talk) 12:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Carabinieri History
Of course I've got good info about the matter, and it.wiki is a "mine" of info as well. May I help you anyway about that subject? --Filippof (talk) 16:35, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Robert Morning Sky
An editor has nominated Robert Morning Sky, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Morning Sky and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Spaceship Moon
I've opened a discussion for this subject at Talk:Moon. Given the controversial nature, it is appropriate to seek consensus for inclusion first rather than just restoring the material. Thanks. --Ckatzchatspy 18:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
- Please see my reply at Talk:Moon. Let's try and resolve this without disrupting the article, and approach it realistically. The "theory" is not a generally accepted one, and the concept of a "hollow moon" is discredited by science. Given the fringe nature of this, then, you are far more likely to find that the text will "stick" if you can build a solid case for inclusion, and convince others of it, before repeatedly trying to insert it. Cheers. --Ckatzchatspy 09:33, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] LEIU
Hey there, if you're gonna add allegations to articles like Law Enforcement Intelligence Unit, you're gonna have to add a reliable source. I have removed your addition. Murderbike (talk) 03:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] ASTAR (company)
How do you know so much bout Spanish firearms?--71.185.193.245 (talk) 17:29, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Cut-and-paste moves
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently copied the contents of a page and pasted it into another with a different name. Specifically, you copied the contents of Marine (military) This is what we call a "cut and paste move", and it is very undesirable because it splits the article's history, which is needed for attribution and is helpful in many other ways. The mechanism we use for renaming articles is to move it to a new name which both preserves the page's history and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. In most cases, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. If there is an article that you cannot move yourself by this process, follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Requested moves to request the move by another. Also, if there are any other articles that you copied and pasted, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. - BillCJ (talk) 19:57, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Marine (military)
Because of your recent cut-and-paste move of Marine (military), I've opened a dicussion on the article's fate. Please feel free to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Maritime warfare task force#Marine (military), as I've made several proposals for the disposition of the article. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 07:12, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Enfant terrible
I notice that you've added content maintaining that the term enfant terrible originated with Thomas Jefferson. Given that Websters only traces this term back to 1851, and Jefferson died in 1826, it would be useful if you could supply sources to back up your additions. Moreover, the move from enfant terrible to l'enfant terrible is poorly motived. Websters doesn't even carry an entry on l'enfant terrible, only enfant terrible. The article was in the right place at enfant terrible.
Bathrobe (talk) 05:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of TsNIITochMash
A tag has been placed on TsNIITochMash requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ninety:one 15:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] ARCAM Corporation
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article ARCAM Corporation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Oo7565 (talk) 06:06, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Vietnamese Rangers
Nice work! Thanks for the help. I was more or less out of references, as the ARVN Rangers and their advisers are relatively obscure. Thanks again for taking the article from a stub to a real article! EvilCouch (talk) 00:56, 28 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Wikimedia Commons
Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is, however, another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading your media there instead. That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--OsamaK 01:53, 5 June 2008 (UTC)