User talk:Tometoyou

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Speedy deletion of Tim MoMH

A tag has been placed on Tim MoMH requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andreworkney (talk) 19:03, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello Tometoyou & Wilkommen! Welkom! Bienvenue! Benvenuti! ようこそ! Välkommen! Witamy! Bem-vindo(a)! ¡Bienvenido! Добро пожаловать! 欢迎! Basically, welcome to Wikipedia!

Български | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | Italiano | Lietuvių | 한국어 | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Português Русский | Suomi | Svenska | Türkçe | 简体中文 | The main embassy page [edit]

Getting Started
Getting help
The Commmunity
Policies and Guidelines
Things to do
Click here to respond to this message!

GtstrickyTalk or C 18:36, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tim MoMH

Hello. The article you created, Tim MoMH, has been moved to user space where you may develop it further and bring it into line with policies and guidelines prior to establishing it. It can be found at User:Tometoyou. Please review the notability guidelines on biographies. Your article will need to assert the subject's encyclopedic significance and verify notability with reliable secondary sources. It will need to be written neutrally and without original research. This is particularly important in biographies of living persons, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Before attempting to move the article, please read over your first article. If you have questions about any of this, please feel free to ask at my talk page, or you can seek help at Wikipedia's help desk, which is manned around the clock by volunteers. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Tim MoMH

A tag has been placed on Tim MoMH requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 19:12, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Tim MoMH has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Prodego talk 19:14, 22 February 2008 (UTC)