User talk:Tom noll

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] License tagging for Image:CSS Studio.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CSS Studio.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Holy Hill

According to the Erin, Wisconsin town website, Holy Hill is located in Erin, Wisconsin. Also 2 Wisconsin county atlases put Holy Hill in Erin, Wisconsin.Thank you-RFD 18:22, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Your image of Holy Hill is currently featured on the main page representing the shrine. The article is listed in the Did You Know section for the best new articles. It is considered a new expansion because I expanded it from a 4 sentence stub to a decent-sized article. Another contributor liked the image so much that he requested that your image be displayed on the main page! Nice snap! Royalbroil 15:50, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:CSS NewStudio.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:CSS NewStudio.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. BaronLarf 06:33, 30 July 2006 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as spamming external links, are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Wafulz 19:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page by adding commercial external links, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wafulz 19:58, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked for reinserting images which have been removed because of legal and fair use concerns. Your actions can be seen as vandalism. --BaronLarf 01:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Example requests for permission for what needs to be done in order for copyrighted images to be used. Cheers --BaronLarf 19:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:CSS_building.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CSS_building.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:21, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cathedral of St. Helena

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cathedral of St. Helena, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.sthelenas.org/history.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Leptat glass

A tag has been placed on Leptat glass, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 19:24, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion of Bernard O. Gruenke Sr.

A tag has been placed on Bernard O. Gruenke Sr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ukexpat (talk) 19:21, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Spam

I assume that you work for Conrad Schmitt Studios so we will be watching you closely for spam. However the only spammy thing about the Leptat glass article seemed to be the ® symbol - which we do not need in Wikipedia. So I have rescued it from speedy deletion. However if you want to demonstrate that you are not a spammer, you will: start the glass engraving article, include in it a note about Leptat glass and turn Leptat glass into a redirect. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 23:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Slab glass

Please find me a written or online citation that the Christ Pantocrator window recently added to the Stained glass page really is the first one in the US. Amandajm (talk) 05:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your question

Thank you for your message - I deleted the page because it did not assert the importance of the subject - that's to say that it failed the criteria at WP:CSD. If you disagree then I will happily review my decision, or alternatively you can ask for it to be reviewed by other administrators at WP:Deletion review. Feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. GBT/C 23:02, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Guilded Leptat.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Tom noll!
We thank you for uploading Image:Guilded Leptat.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:30, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Christ on rainbow.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Hi Tom noll!
We thank you for uploading Image:Christ on rainbow.jpg, but there is a problem. Your image is currently missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. Unless you can help by adding a copyright tag, it may be deleted by an Administrator. If you know this information, then we urge you to add a copyright tag to the image description page. We apologize for this, but all images must confirm to policy on Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks so much for your cooperation.
This message is from a robot. --John Bot III (talk) 17:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)