Talk:Tommy Lee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Greek
Thanks to whoever made this page! I had always wondered what ethnicity Tommy Lee is. -- Wikipedian2005 05:48, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Birthdate?
There seem to be some confusion about his birthdate. Wiki and IMDb says October 3, but VH1.com says it's March 10 [1] Any other reliable source? Thief12 03:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
- His mother, I guess?
(When you use the capabilities after kicked off from E-NE,to all returns: Please don't rosak. Be onest and please don't go tattoing(2 counts of;+1 of sedih! So rosak me! Then what? Why? I am not a uni.( ()This female you keep sending me is not my other half and please don't replicate me for your uni for I can't be. HARAM. For uni is only 1 uni + 1:Above! Tomm you please don't keep croniking my body. I know when I'm sick due to tahaning all your movings to pleasement when ha dah chooose then but now she meaning the real girl is very piss off. I am what all of your gejala salah dan pembawakan salah. If only I could have 1 wish? Apakah kejujuran cinta ku untuk si ? Dan tahukah kamu, diri ku sedih dan sangan uzur kerapa tahu diri semua ingin merosakkan ku. Sudah berjaya dan menjulang cita-cita untuk menjadi manusia biasa?Dan mempunyai anak-anak yang sihat belaka dan cantik molek?Siapakah DiRI ini? Janganlah semua menganiayai insani yang kamu semua mencuri dna untuk menbuat kesalahan yang terlalu akan membebankan dosa yang teramat. Kenara diriku diganggu dan dijadikan bahan ? Hoi! Lupa diri dan daratan? Jangan lupa kejadian suci. Rupa Izrae ialah? Letaklah kalau nak letak. Jangan silap mengguna halusan tandukmu untuk merasuk kalbu suci! Dirimu yang suci telah diselamatkan tetapi yang lain;goodness!.( yANG SUDAH SUDAH. pLEASE DON'T PENING ME ANYMORE AND PLEASE DON'T DRUM MY BEATS. tHANK YOU. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.111.11.28 (talk) 14:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
I think it's march but nobody can be sure —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.108.100.126 (talk) 01:25, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Relationships with Tommy Lee
Hello,
[ SPAM ] is meant to give the visitor a wide angle view of how Tommy Lee handles his relationships in essence and in practice. It also allows the visitor to examine the characteristics of his own relationships with Tommy Lee.
Both content and test are based on sound astrological knowledge and research which gained vast popularity among web surfers.
I believe that even though Astrology is not considered a mainstream science, these knowledge and compatibility tool should be made available to whomever wishes to study Tommy Lee as broadly as possible.
I have no desire to be considered a spammer and I don't want to force [ SPAM ]'s article.
I ask you, authors of Tommy Lee that if you have an objection to placing a link to [ SPAM ] in the External Links section, please write it here. Else, I’ll place the link hoping that it would be a valid resource for Tommy Lee's fans and researchers.
With appreciation, Midas touch 05:21, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
- In view of WP:NOT, scilicet, "Wikipedia is not a collection of external links" and "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information", I think that we oughn't to include this link; I cannot imagine that the community writ large would consider an astrological analysis of Tommy Lee's compatability with Pamela Anderson to be encyclopedic. Though User:Midas touch has properly posed the question as to the propriety of the insertion of the link here, as properly suggested on his talk page, and though no one has objected to its inclusion in eight days, I can't abide one's inferring from the absence of such objection that the community writ large accede to the inclusion of the link. On his talk page, Midas touch well notes that, even were one to disprove entirely of the usage of astrology (especially astrology qua science), the link may nevertheless be of interest to those who desire to learn about Tommy Lee. Whilst surely this is true, were the satisfaction of that criterion sufficient to merit the inclusion of a link in an article, articles would become vast repositories of links. Finally, notwithstanding Midas touch's genial attitude and willingness to seek consensus, for which characteristics he is to be commended, it should be noted that his user page reveals him to be an employee or devotee of the site, which surely leads one to consider WP:SPAM. User:Hansnesse apparently requested general comment on the adding of the astrology links to sundry celebrity biographies, but I don't find any record of the discussion's having been moved to a talk page; it was likely deleted after having spent seven days in the pump archive. In any case, for the reasons enumerated supra, I am reverting the insertion of the link. Joe
-
- Thank you, Joe for your answer and council. Have you not reverted the link, I would do it myself in complete respect to your position. One last note: you kind of used the fact that I'm affiliated with [ DELETED LINK SPAM ] against me and even associated my activity with WP:SPAM. Contrary! While it's so easy to disguise one's identity and hide such affiliation, I make sure to maintain proper disclosure as a part of my codes of ethics. Midas touch 06:30, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
I assume good faith on the part of Midas touch. however, as I mentioned on the talkpage of Hasnesse, talkpages also get picked up by google and hence this approach can be used to carpet-bomb the articles' talkpages, thus increasing the number of google hits. I have gone through several of the proposed links and find that they all would be considered unencyclopedic. I suggest that he stop adding these requests and that someone blank out discussion about Topsynergy from all the talkpages that it has appeared in. TIA, --Gurubrahma 08:55, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- Dear Gurubrahma, I already proposed to change the external linking template to NOFOLLOW so there won't be hidden motives to posting links other than their usefulness for the readers. Stop blaming me for intentions that do not exist and improve Wikipedia's functionality by advocating this proposal. Thanks, Midas touch 05:20, 20 March 2006 (UTC)
-
- Assuming good faith is one thing, but look at this guy's edits. He's spamming every movie star related bio. And his links on these talk pages are nothing but spam. Wikipedia's scope does not include promoting pseudoscience. The astrological POV is not one that Wiki considers reliable, it's pseudoscience at best and is no more reliable than flipping a coin. The links he has left on these talks pages will serve only to boost the traffic to his psuedoscience web site. The links on this talk page should be deleted. And Midas, knock off the innocent routine, you have spammed your site all over Wiki and had numerous objections. Your User page is a violation of Wikipedia policy, promoting your website is not allowed. Mr Christopher 22:30, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
he has a huge cock have you seen his vid with pam? we should include that.--Velanthis 22:21, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Link Misdirect
The link in the discography for "Never a Dull Moment" goes to the Rod Stewart album of the same name. I'm not sure how to go about finding the correct entry, but I assume there rather is not one yet. I would like to leave it to someone else to fix this error correctly. Thanks. Decatur
[edit] male porn star
should we put him into this kind of category? Because even Paris Hilton is not in the category like female porn star. Hans
He has a good sized penis but he only acted in a home vid with pam anderson. no he's no porn star.
[edit] Sections
The biographical information (who he married, his kids, etc.) should be seperated from his professional history. 75.3.233.208 09:49, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] I added link to official Motley Crue Website
I added an external link to the Offical Motley Crue website because the subject of the article is a founding and current member of the band and is currently on tour with them. The official site has further info about the subject of the Wikipedia article so I figure it should be here. Any objections? Monkeybreath 03:30, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Trivia
Maybe I am alone in my belief that Wkipedia should be free of Trivia, and if that is so then I will fight the good fight. i will not remove the trivia section without discussion, however I implore discussion on this matter as soon as is possible. - Kaobear 19:39, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Semi-protection
Holy shit, that's far too much vandalism. I sp'd it to reduce it by a lot. Hopefully it'll help. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.107.197.242 (talk) 00:54, 25 December 2006 (UTC).
[edit] Six-degrees vandalism
Removed. It's a modified copy of the section from Kevin Bacon.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Tophat..jpg
Image:Tophat..jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 01:44, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
I was trying to fix this topic so if I messed anyhing up, please fix it. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Irishman76 (talk • contribs) 18:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Daniel Karven-Veres drowning & "Hold me down"
Has Tommy Lee ever mentioned in interviews that this song artistically alludes to the fatal pool incident? When I first heard this song years ago, it was the first thing I thought of. 67.5.157.144 (talk) 08:30, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] About this swastika tattoo --
Um, I'm really confused when it comes to this lawsuit over the tattoo. "When the photographer sued Lee, the swastika tattoo (which Lee has since removed) was said to be visible" -- was the tattoo visible when he was sued? Or was it said to be visible when he attacked the photographer? I don't get the relevance in either instance. Honestly, though, I'm confused about which is true, and I think a lot of other readers would be too. Could somebody with knowledge in the matter please clarify? Nizingur (talk) 16:06, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Nizingur