Talk:Tom Cruise: Unauthorized

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tom Cruise: Unauthorized article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Books Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments.

The Arbitration Committee has placed all Scientology-related articles on probation (see relevant arbitration case). Editors making disruptive edits may be banned by an administrator from this and related articles, or other reasonably related pages.

	Scientology Portal This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments

[edit] See also

The See also section here is relevant, it references topics that deal with Cruise, and will be expanded upon. Smee 04:38, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

Hmm, have to agree with you there. It's funny, my potential list of pages to watch is starting to look like I'm stalking certain people, you included Smee. I believe it may be a case of similar interests. Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation. I'm waiting for a lawsuit. Raeft 17:43, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

I do not understand? Was that last bit sarcasm? Smee 18:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

"Nice page here, and nice work. Now to expand it as things occur in relation." - But thank you very much for those kind words, that means a lot! Smee 18:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC).

Ha, no, not explicitly sarcasm. I meant moreso that I believe the forthcoming legal action, sure to occur, will be interesting and very public, thus making it easily documentable in a fine article. Further, I've noted one of our first issues: When searching Tom Cruise, this does not come up, not even on a disambiguation in a "To see other" link underneath his name on the Tom Cruise page. Just a thought... Raeft 20:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)