Talk:Tom Corbett, Space Cadet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The images reappeared on the Wiki server so I restored the images.Cokerwr 19:21, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
All the images that accompanied this entry have been deleted by Wikipedia for reasons unknown. I have deleted the dead links since tbey left large, unslightly holes in the text.Cokerwr 22:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
There is information under Space Cadet (the Heinlein novel) that should appear under Tom Corbett. I am copying/moving the material from Space Cadet, since it belongs with Tom Corbett, and I hope someone will know enough to verify the information. Zaslav 01:05, 30 January 2006 (UTC)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS FOR PAGE MOVE, per discussion below. It's true that there's no policy reason to reserve the main title for whichever page was created first; in this case, using the main title for a disambiguation page seems quite reasonable. -GTBacchus(talk) 02:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Requested move
Tom Corbett, Space Cadet → Tom Corbett — This page was original entitled Tom Corbett, however was moved to "make way" for an article on an attorney general. I beleive the current consensus is that in the case of articles with the same name, the first article created gets precedence. J E Bailey 20:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Survey
Add * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''' on a new line followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~.
- Oppose I am not aware of a policy as stated. Some believe the policy should be that real people get preference over fictional characters. I think it may be best to have Tom Corbett as a dab page. -- Beardo 01:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. I created a dab for meantime - but: the name of the series is Tom Corbett, Space Cadet, and the article is about the whole thing, not just the character. "Tom Corbett" only clearly refers to one thing: the AG of Pennsylvania. This is a good case for top-line disambiguation - and this is what I propose we continue to have. - CrazyRussian talk/email 00:28, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Discussion
Add any additional comments:
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:KPep.jpg
Image:KPep.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Tom corbett tv still.jpg
Image:Tom corbett tv still.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 08:22, 21 January 2008 (UTC)