User talk:Toledino
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Spamming of http://spam.goodnet.gr
- Spam sock accounts
Goodnet (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)
Toledino (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log)
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Hu12 22:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
@Hu12
You are upsolutely wrong in deleting the link to the only news portal, forum & business directory of Rethymno town. On the same time you have at least 3 broken links (leading to NO pages) on the same article! Isn't that stupidity or what??? You also axcept at least 2-3 more commercial external links that are nothing but advertisements!!! That is unacceptable! Either remove all commercial websites from the page of Rethymno or accept GOODnet.gr as it the only online news resource of the region.
Regards, Toledino— Toledino (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 22:27, 15 May 2007 (UTC).
-
- see External links policy Links normally to be avoided --Hu12 22:30, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Removing warnings, whether for vandalism or other forms of prohibited/discouraged behavior, from one's talk page is considered vandalism WP:VAND--Hu12 22:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Other than those stupid warnings, you do not have anything else to say regarding my points???— Toledino (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 22:35, 15 May 2007 (UTC).
While allowing 7 other 100% commercial website, while 2-3 of them do not lead anywhere (broken links) should be considered what? I do not know all the rules around here, but your remarks, under the circumstances I describe above, are rediculous!—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Toledino (talk • contribs) 22:49, 15 May 2007.
- Those need to go, too. The fact that we haven't gotten around to it, yet, does not mean that we have some obligation to have your site.See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--Hu12 22:56, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
You certainly have no obligation, but the above facts and the state of the specific article is certainly misleading. You were very prompt in deleting my entry and you have repeatedly fail to correct all those problematic links... That is at least negligence! Anyway, I am glad that this situation helped in cleaning up Rethymno's article from all that garbage!
Regards, Toledino
