User talk:Tokle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Maidstone

Hi Tokle. I have long since expected to find a placename derivation to have one simply strightforward explanation! The BBC talk about 'maidens' in their derivation, and most others seem to follow the same argument. If you are suggesting 'Great Hill' I suppose we should then look to see if we can find the hill so used. Maidstone, of course, stands on a ridge and not a hill: so ancient folk (if the derivation comes from them) must had have some height along the ridge in mind or sight when naming the town, I should have thought. Where does your derivation come from? Peter Shearan 18:16, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sorry but my only reference book doesn't reveal the Roman name - if there was one. Lots of Roman artefacts found around there of course and the Roman road passed through: you would think that the Romans , of all people, would have had a name for it!! Peter Shearan 16:53, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Does this reference help at all? Peter Shearan 17:28, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Help with maps?

Hei, I've seen you've uploaded some maps on Commons detailing the unification of Norway. Would you be willing to make one or more illustrating Sverre I of Norway? That would be really helpfull Fornadan (t) 15:04, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

The borders during the civil wars were never well-defined, and they were constantly changing. Trying to trace the minute alterations to the borders of the territories controlled by Sverre at any given time would be too grand a task for me right now. I can create a map positioning the place-names mentioned in the article, would that be what you had in mind? --Tokle 19:21, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

A location map was what I had in mind yes. To increase readability the place names should probably be enlarged bit though, and perhaps the background red somewhat lighter.

As for editing on the Norwegian wiki, don't think so, not in any major way at least. The internationality of the English wiki is what appeals the most at the moment. Fornadan (t) 08:45, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] TfD nomination of Template:Album_infobox_2

Template:Album_infobox_2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Album_infobox_2. Thank you. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 17:35, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Album infobox 2 deletion debate....

Just so you know, the album infobox 2 template (which you inserted into The Beatles' albums) is now being considered for deletion. I like the style and am against the deletion. But I figured you may want to weigh in. Here's the link: [1].

BGC 21:00, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Voting

Γεια σου — ειμαι καλα, ευχαριστω... και εσυ;

There's no set number, different admins having different cut-off points. The rubric at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion reads: "Your opinion will be given the most weight if you are logged in with an account that already existed when the nomination was made. Unregistered and new users are welcome to contribute to the discussion, but their recommendations may be discounted, especially if they seem to be made in bad faith (for example, if they misrepresent their reasons)." Because we have so much trouble from sock-puppets, many Wikipedia regulars note very new editors for the closing admin's attention (I seem to remember it happening to me when I first started editing). --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:22, 14 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Infobox 2 proposed for deletion

You managed to get your comment up before I could alert you here. I can't answer the question about a redirect myself; I don't recall seeing the suggestion in the original debate. Monicasdude 20:55, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

== Thank you ==

blue flowers

I just wanted to let you know that your initiative on integrating that {{Click}} function in album infobox 2 is greatly appreciated. It's great when users take a bold and proactive approach to the 'pedia, and it always puts a smile on my face. Flowers for everyone who makes me smile :) --Qirex 11:09, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Kent template

Hi- I noticed your name on Category:Wikipedians in Kent and thought I may be able to interest you in a new userbox for your user page. By entering the template {{User Kent}}, you will able to produce the following:


Please remove the template from this talk page once you have read this message, otherwise the talk page is added to the Wikipedians in Kent category.

Regards, Image:Anglo-indian.jpg Deano (Talk) 19:07, 30 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Region?

We need to review the terms used for various types of regions of Norway, esp. the current erroneous term "landscape", but also landsdel and tettsted. See for instance Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Norway#.22Landscape.22. -- Egil 16:09, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Birkbeck

Would you like to join Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Birkbeck, University of London? Timrollpickering 20:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use images in discographies

To be honest, I can't remember any of this new policy actually making its way to the albums project page. (Is it there? I can only assume it's not if you can't find it.) Since nothing has changed since the last discussion, I think it's an issue of the editors not knowing, and none of our usual patrollers having found it yet. –Unint 20:32, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Angels and Daemons at Play (albumcover).jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Angels and Daemons at Play (albumcover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:30, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Demon Box (Motorpsycho).jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Demon Box (Motorpsycho).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Trust Us (albumcover).jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Trust Us (albumcover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:22, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Non-free use disputed for Image:Let Them Eat Cake (albumcover).jpg

Warning sign This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Let Them Eat Cake (albumcover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Inthefishtank13cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Inthefishtank13cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:08, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vikings tarot deck

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Vikings tarot deck, because another editor is suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of the page. B. Wolterding (talk) 17:52, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over at Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 02:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)