Template talk:Tokyo Mew Mew

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Suggestion to use built-in template

Please consider Template:Navbox generic to build the navigation template on, it seems to give great results. - G.A.S 17:54, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

Preview:
v • d • e
Characters in Tokyo Mew Mew
Heroines Ichigo Momomiya · Mint Aizawa · Lettuce Midorikawa · Pudding Fong · Zakuro Fujiwara · Berry Shirayuki · Ringo Akai · Hime Azumi
Friends Masaya Aoyama · The Blue Knight · Ryou Shirogane · Keiichiro Akasaka · Tasuku Meguro · Masha · Ucha · Minor characters
Antagonists Aliens: Pie · Kish · Tart · Gateau du Rowa
Other: Deep Blue · Chimera Anima · Baku · Saint Rose Crusaders
v • d • e
Tokyo Mew Mew
Information Tokyo Mew Mew · International adaptations of Tokyo Mew Mew
Episodes List of episodes
Spin-offs Tokyo Mew Mew à la Mode · Tokyo Black Cat Girl

Above tables also display nicely on the small screen of a pocketpc. Sincerely

G.A.S 08:47, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Alternatively, it could be used as a single template as follow (?)

Futher information to be added could include: Publisher / animator / writer / voice cast / similar anime

v • d • e
Tokyo Mew Mew
Information Tokyo Mew Mew · International adaptations of Tokyo Mew Mew
Episodes List of episodes
Spin-offs Tokyo Mew Mew à la Mode · Tokyo Black Cat Girl

Sincerely

G.A.S 16:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] CODE

{{Tokyo Mew Mew}} —

[edit] Layout

Please consider changing the layout of the template, as the current format is not neat anymore, as there are only two links other than characters in the left. This is especially necessary if the amount of articles in this category is to be reduced to four. Also have a look at this or this template, both of which is quite neat, and which be used as an example. G.A.S 06:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I agree it needs to be redone, however that can probably wait until the article clean up is done. If it ends up only being four when done, this template wouldn't really be needed at all. Collectonian (talk) 07:00, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
True, according to WP:NAV, if there are only a handful of articles, "see also", "{{main}}" and "{{see also}}" would suffice. But, in the meanwhile, according to the same essay, {{Navbox}} is the standard for footer boxes, and existing boxes should be converted. Would you mind if I change it accordingly? G.A.S 08:32, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Go for it :) Collectonian (talk) 12:43, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Temporary solution:
At the end of the day this would probably be obsolete, or at most (less articles removed/merged at that time):
At that time we can reconsider adding new groups such as publications/media, etc; depending on content. G.A.S 06:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Looks good to me :) Collectonian (talk) 07:37, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
Y Done G.A.S 14:11, 18 March 2008 (UTC)