User talk:Tme2nsb

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Screw this

Why even try to fight against an unstoppable beast- I'm only one man, so I can't do crap except be VERY critical of Wikipedia. I just advise that you staffers should do your duties a little bit better, because at the current rate, all hope had been lost a long time ago. Good day.

This is my statement, nothing further or nothing less unless I decide to change my stance. which is probably not very likely to happen in this next one-thousand years

[edit] Sources for Bemanistyle

If you have a source (I can't read it do to my work firewall), I suggest to add it to the article. Improbcat 18:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

To the ones saying I'm being disruptive.

• You're the only ones causing disruption. Tried posting articles, and were promptly removed quicker than older articles that are worse that have been up for a year, and found it as censorship :) And as for BemaniStyle, I can put up a cached version because I'm what you people call a "Volunteer" for the site. Your acts as gods is very questionable and very laughable, and all pages are being cached for showing the world of the abuse you all like to do to contributors, and apparently you don't know anything about what is copyright and what is not. So, just letting you know that a few media outlets will be reporting on this in the next few days.--The Manator E 21:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Dude, I'm a editor just like you. I have exactly as much access and ability to edit and modify articles as you do.

I have no idea what quoting you edit history has to do with my suggestion that you put up and sources you have.

If you have a cached version with references, by all means, put it up.

And if you want to "show the world" that wikipedia volunteers want you to make your article meet the same standards as other articles, go right ahead. though I'm not even sure what you are talking about there because I can't decipher you writing style. Improbcat 21:11, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

No, it's nothing personal, I just found it disgusting that my article was DELETED while I was writing it. I put the initial link up first to have a reference point, and then I see tons of other articles that have no sources AT ALL being allowed to stay on the database, it's just crazy to think that one little tiny article gets smashed over some huge ass articles that have little or no signficance (you can argue like mine). It's called picking on the little guy - I posted my history because Firequeen or whatever her name was saying all of my edits have been nothing but abuse and insults, which is completely untrue. --The Manator E 21:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC)