User talk:Tkguy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page Asiaphile on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 04:00, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NickCwik 23:27, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:54, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR Violation

You have violated the three-revert rule, as you have reverted the same article four times in one day. This warrants a 24-hour block. I urge you to stop reverting this article, or I will report you. Thank you. —Christopher Mann McKaytalk 03:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

One minute after I posted this, you reverted Asian fetish for the fifth time today. I am going to assume good faith and assume you did not see this comment before you reverted it. If you do not revert the article back to its previous state, before you reverted, I will report you. —Christopher Mann McKaytalk 03:53, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
you reverted twice and Kaiten many more times. Now what are you going to do? Let me guess go running to another computer and do it anonymously? Non-asian men obsessively trying to make asian fetish into a positive? Come one we all know what you are.
I am not trying to do anything. Your edits are inappropriate and are not in par with Wikipedia policies.—Christopher Mann McKaytalk 04:13, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
So you use Kaiten as a way to skirt around the 3rr rule and you are trying to make asian fetish, a racist term, into something like a harmless shoe fetish. Asian are not like shoes, clothing, etc. We are people. Not things that exist for you to define and for your pleasure. I've included an arguments against asian fetish section and this is where your material belongs. Or create another section but do not redefine Asian Fetish with isolated opinionated articles when the overwhelming majority of the references contradicts them. Tkguy (talk) 05:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

{{unblock|First off I was not aware of the 3 revert rule. Being new to the wikipedia editing. If you look at Christopher Mann McKay's talk page you will see that the guy have been vandalizing a lot of pages. He removed and deleted content from Campus Watch (a pro-Jewish think tank). He deleted accusation of anti-gay actions made by the AFA (American Family Association) from the AFA page. And he deletes much of the content off the Asian Fetish page too. He seemed to have teamed up with Kaitenbushi to skirt the 3 revert rule. The two took turn to make sure the page only contained the bare minimum material that adhere to their notion of what asian fetish is. If you look at the Asian Fetish page there have been many many people deleting any and all entries that makes Asian Fetish something negative. Please note that another user Kaitenbushi violated the 3 revert rule as well. Chistopher stopped at 2. Obviously Christopher knew what he was doing and IMO he was leading me on.Tkguy (talk) 02:22, 30 November 2007 (UTC)}}


I am strongly considering unblocking you (since you are relatively new and you weren't warned before the third revert as you should have been, but I have contacted the blocking admin for her opinion. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Y

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

After discussing this with the blocking admin, I've decided to unblock you. Please be mindful of our policies on the three revert rule and edit warring.

Request handled by: east.718 at 04:07, November 30, 2007

Thanks Tkguy (talk) 04:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Tkguy, after reading your request and looking deeper into the history, I saw that you were indeed correct that you were not the only user to violate the 3RR policy. After some consideration, I believe it best that all involved be able to continue editing, however, the article in which this dispute has taken place is now fully protected. Any changes must first be discussed on the article's talk page. Once a consensus has been reached, an admin can make those changes. As I stated on that page, if a revert war resumes after the protection has been lifted, then there will be blocks. I hope that can be avoided, and please feel free to contact me if you need assistance. Best regards, Lara❤Love 04:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for unblocking me LaraLove. I am concerned that the version of the Asian Fetish page that is now protected is the one that Christopher Mann McKay has been working on for a long time. Is it possible that we start with the version of the page that he is trying to revert from? I think it's a more objective version of the page and a much better point to start from. It has all the entries Chris supports but it does not however let them define Asian fetish by putting them as the first sentences on the page. Here's the version I am proposing to use 07:51, 29 November 2007 . I will put this entry on the talk page for Asian Fetish when I am unblocked. I am still block as of now. Tkguy (talk) 04:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Discuss it on the article's talk page. Personally, the current version doesn't read very NPOV to me, but I haven't read through the topic to get more familiar with it. Start talking it out there. Let me know if it goes no where. Lara❤Love 13:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
I've put my request on the talk page and was told that it's not valid. I've rewrote my request for individual edits on the talk page. Seems like my requests are being ignored. Is there something I am doing wrong in the way I am going about for asking the blocked contributer's content be changed? Tkguy 04:56, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Improvements

Hi Tkguy. I think you are on the right tack with this article, though there are clearly some aspects that need to be improved and gaps to be filled. I have some extra info and would like to hear your views on it, so send me an email and we can improve constructive editing. Aberdeenharbour (talk) 07:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Long term improvements

Hi again. I am communicating more closely with Sandstein[1], and would like your input on the way forward. We need to do this by the rules, and I am still not totally sure how to go about things. Lets get a productive plan together. I noticed the civility rules here are pretty tight[2][3][4] It seems to be a good place for us to move forward with more effectiveness. Email me if you have any specific concerns. Aberdeenharbour (talk) 06:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the support. I skimmed the references you've provided and I believe I am adhering to the rules. But either way I believe Chris and Kaitenbushi are the same and Chris been accused of vandalizing many many pages. So I am not worried about these two guys trying to do anything with me. BTW I prefer to be anonymous for stuff like this. Tkguy (talk) 08:52, 8 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Asian fetish

At the bottom of external links there is a section called "editorials." It already has too many external links so I got rid of one. They all explain the same thing anyways. deals with sterotypes regarding asian men and women and possible causes of asian fetish etc. 68.38.212.180 (talk) 02:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

I am actually User:Saranghae honey. Sometimes I feel too lazy to log back on, and I sometimes make edits with anon IP. I'll try not to do this in the future and I'm pretty sure what I did is not encouraged by Wikipedia. If you have any further comments, please post one at my talk page. Thanks. mirageinred (talk) 02:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Why do you accuse me of being biased? mirageinred (talk) 04:19, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
I initially thought the entire article was crap because it was poorly written. I tried to delete the article, and didn't work. I'm not "mitigating" anything and most of the contributions to the article (which you don't seem to like) weren't even made by me. Sadly enough, the article hasn't looked any better in the last three months. I tried to delete some links because it goes against WP:EL, which says that the article is not just a collection of links. mirageinred (talk) 04:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Btw, what I deleted is not a source, but an external link. They are two different things. mirageinred (talk) 04:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Note that I removed the Anna Mae He affair as that needs a source. User:Christopher Mann McKay is perfectly right to remove text without sources without warning. The sources should be provided; if they aren't, they should go. I'm not sure what you want me to do at WP:AIV since he has only edited the article once today. Besides, what do you mean he was "tricking" edits to 3RR? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:30, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Typically out of etiquette people putting a request for citation flag prior to deleting material. Especially people who have not been a regular editor to a page. This has not happen for the Anna Mae He entry. I already provided a source in which an international adoptee acknowledge that her parent adopted her part because of her asian fetish. You can derive from that international adoption has an element of asian fetish involved. And I put in a reference to the Anna Mae He Affair page. I will look for more reference. I hope you are aware of this incident. A chinese child was put up for temporary foster care by a chinese family due to financial and medical crisis. But then the foster family decided they wanted to keep the chinese child even though the chinese family had no intentions of giving up their baby. It took many years before the He family could get Anna Mae back. This was because the foster family was well connected and did everything possible to keep Anna.
As for your deletion of the pathological section. I found it harsh and abrupt considering you do not have a history of editing this page. There is a Sex crimes against Asian women in the United States page that has many more entries. I will recreate the section with these references. Please do not delete until a discussion has been made.
As for the phoebe citation. I found the reference to the "The Asian Mystique" entry was a gross misinterpretation of the material. So I figured the Phoebe would be the same. Example this is what Chris claimed to be what the source is trying to say:

"Asian fetish denotes a sexual attraction favoring Asian people for their race and perceptions of their culture."

This is what the book actually says:

"Asian and Asian-American women on the receiving end feel—as Liao and Kwon say—objectified and valued not for who they are as people, but for their race or perceptions of their culture."

It's obvious that the idea trying to be conveyed in "The Asian Mystique" source was grossly manipulated. So after seeing this I knew that the Phoebe entry which I have discussed on the talk page as being racist against asians (yes asians can be racist against asians) was probably a gross misinterpretation as well. I wanted to get the actual quote from Phoebe.
As for chris trying to trick people. Have you read the top half of my page? I explain what Chris was doing and all the admin seems to be in agreement. I actually got 3rr blocked but they rescinded it after they saw what Chris and Kaitenbushi was doing. I suggest you look in the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR. Here is the entry that Chris made. And the entry that I made that got my band removed.

[edit] User:Tkguy reported by User:Christopher Mann McKay (Result: )

Asian fetish (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs). Tkguy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · block user · block log): Time reported: 04:10, 29 November 2007 (UTC)



After reverting 5 times on the same article on the same day, I notified the user of this violation (20:51, 28 November 2007 diff), the user then strangely responded to me (20:56, 28 November 2007 diff and 21:03, 28 November 2007 diff) and continued to revert the article.


Please note that I obviously am new to wikipedia in the way I sign my posts and my formatting and please note that the page in question is the Asian Fetish page. Also there's a person by the handle User:Kaitenbushi who seems to be taking turns with User:Christopher Mann McKay to eliminate any materials they do not agree with from the Asian Fetish page and claiming that there are no material to support this material when there are many references on the page and many other pages on wikipedia that relates to Asian Fetish.
I believe I was purposely trapped into this 3rr rule which I was not familiar with. Also User:Christopher Mann McKay was sited for not updating the Campus Watch (a American pro-Israel neoconservative think tank) page in a constructive manner on 15:35, 28 November 2007. [5]
The following is a schedule of all the reverts that User:Kaitenbushi and User:Christopher Mann McKay did today. I would not be surprised if these two are the same person, which I would imagine is a way to skirt the rules.
I apologize to the wikipedia community for not understanding the rules and will reframe from repeatedly reverting the content of the Asian Fetish page. Sorry if I am going against the etiquettes by posting my comment here. Once again I am new to this.
Tkguy (talk) 05:44, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Careful

Hi TKGuy. I'd hate to see you getting blocked or banned. Its really not a good idea to call anyone a vandal on talkpages. Other editors and admins see it as something that reduces the power of your argument also. I think your general approach to editing is fine though and you seem to have a very positive effect. I also want to make sure the article is free from fact-perversions and you seem to be a helping hand there. Cheers Aberdeenharbour (talk) 04:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the word of encouragement. I am not too worried about being banned. All I have to do when dealing with Christopher mann mckay is to tell everybody that they just need to look at his talk page history to see what kind of editing he's been doing. and the admin here generally seem to side with me when they see this. Tkguy (talk) 05:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Once again

I don't have an agenda. I nominated Asian fetish for deletion because it was poorly written and I deleted external links because there aren't supposed to be that many in first place. Please read WP:EL and see why I deleted them. There was no source that established a connection between Asian fetish and adoption of Asian babies. Also, you might want to read WP:CIVIL before you accuse me of being a vandal. миражinred (talk) 15:30, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

I agree. The changes made were appropriate. Correction to the headers, removal of original research and irrelevant information. And really, the external links section is still way too long. It needs to be trimmed to a couple links and everything else deleted. I'll let you two work on that considering you know the content. Pick the most relevant. Work the others in as sources or get rid of them. If it's not taken care of, however, I'll step in. Additionally, if the revert warring starts up again, there will be blocks issued. This is the only warning. Last, don't throw around the word vandalism lightly. It's no civil. Saranghae honey's changes were not vandalism. Lara❤Love 18:26, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
Tkguy, you should try to distinguish between references (sources) and external links. If you don't want to see the external links deleted, it's a good idea to integrate them into the footnotes within the article. While articles shouldn't have excessive number of external links, it's never a bad idea to have plenty of sources. I read most of the external links and most of them seem to focus on 1. personal experiences 2. possible reasons why this occur and 3. the effects on the Asian American community. They seem to have the same idea, so it may be a good idea to incorporate the contents into the Asian fetish article and use the editorials as footnotes/sources. миражinred (talk) 23:48, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
The definition of Asian fetish, and the term "fetish" itself, and the usage of the term in the media is broad and unfortunately this does not seem to sit very well with you. I know that Asian fetish is not entirely benign as it is perceived by many people. However, it does seem like your views on Asian fetish are harsher than mine. I'm not mitigating anything. I'm just pointing out that there are multiples definitions for Asian fetish. No one should advance any type of agenda to begin with to edit Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mean to advance anyone's views. миражinred (talk) 07:19, 24 December 2007 (UTC)
If you want to play to game of Gotcha! by yourself, that's fine with me. But it won't be so fun for you if you continue to violate WP:CIVIL. Please take your time to read it. Thanks. миражinred (talk) 16:51, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

I reverted your "background information" because I believe that background information should be neutral. It would be fine as long as you give your heading a new name. And I'll put up Phoebe Eng's quote soon. миражinred 01:42, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

I already explained that I don't. Cool Hand Luke 01:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

I know that you were engaged in an edit war with the two editors in the past and that you were frustrated, and you still very much are. I hope this isn't about doing the guesswork of who is "less Asian" than who, because notions like that are meaningless and I am just as Asian as you, a Korean one at that. You need to assume good faith and assume that other editors also edit the article for improvement. миражinred 08:21, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

WP:AIV is for clear vandalism; it isn't a place to report someone who disagrees with you in a content dispute. If you need help in a content dispute, Dispute Resolution has several useful options. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:07, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh snap! I already checked my edits and I seem to have reverted maximum of three reversions every 24 hours. Thanks for the advice.миражinred 01:28, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AN/I report

I posted a thread about you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Tkguy at Asian fetish. Cool Hand Luke 02:12, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

And I would like to personally ask you to step away from this topic. You seem too passionate about it to maintain NPOV. Try editing in another area. Cool Hand Luke 03:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR violation

You are in violation of the three-revert rule. See [6], [7], [8], [9], and others. It doesn't matter that these reverts were not all of exactly the same material. "An editor does not have to perform the same revert on a page more than three times to breach this rule; all reverts made by an editor on a particular page within a 24 hour period are counted." If you do not retract your last edit, you may be blocked for disruptive editing. *** Crotalus *** 04:03, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] edit summaries

Edit summaries that stick to the content are more productive than commentary about editors like this. Phyesalis (talk) 04:11, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Asian fetish

There seems to be a rough consensus that you're editing disruptively. Will you agree—when the article is unlocked—not to revert the page more than once a day? Cool Hand Luke 00:55, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

If you remove it, I won't revert you. I've tried to keep my own comments directed toward the article. Cool Hand Luke 02:43, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
I commented them out under a hat. If they still offend you, feel free to remove them. Cool Hand Luke 03:22, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

I actually don't mind dispute resolution although I would recommend mediation first. The comments are already put under a hat anyways. миражinred (speak, my child...) 03:23, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Fine with me. миражinred (speak, my child...) 03:35, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok, now that we've reached a mutually satisfactory conclusion, will you agree not to edit war on the article so that we can get it unlocked? Consensus is overwhelmingly against you, and I again suggest that you edit in another area where your POV won't intrude so much upon your neutrality. Cool Hand Luke 04:22, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Asiaphile

An editor has nominated Asiaphile, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asiaphile and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 09:59, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Clue

Don't edit war with the arbitration clerks and clerks' helpers if they make changes on the arbitration case pages. [10] Instead, use their talk pages to politely discuss your concerns. Jehochman Talk 00:53, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

If you continue edit warring on the article against multiple other users, I'm going to block you and seek a community topic ban. I suggest you use the talk page before making edits you know that no one agrees with.

If you are unable to do this voluntarily, you must stop editing this topic. Cool Hand Luke 05:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

No, Tkguy; you've succeeded in edit warring the article to protection with previously two entirely different groups of people in November and December. The page will not be locked again. There is no need to protect the page when the disruption is just one user. You're editing alone to push your POV, and you're a clear WP:SPA. You should discuss your controversial changes first. Cool Hand Luke 05:36, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

There should be no confusion this time as to whether or not you're familiar with 3RR after having previously been blocked for it, nor is there any confusion about your being "tricked" in to violating it. If you continue to revert content you will be blocked for violating it.--Crossmr (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Opinion wanted on ANI

I would value your contribution at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Proposed community topic ban for User:Tkguy on Asian fetish. Cool Hand Luke 06:17, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

I've removed certain edits from the talk page history, so they're no located at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents/More about Tkguy, where discussion is more appropriately focused on the editor. This way the content can easily be deleted once the relevant ANI is over. Cool Hand Luke 07:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for edit-warring and violation of the three-revert rule on Asian fetish. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. MastCell Talk 18:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This is incredible. I was personally attacked on the talk:asian fetish as evident here. I was banned at the request of Cool Hand Luke, who was one of the people,User:Saranghae honey, User:Crotalus_horridus, and Cool Hand Luke, who personally attacked me by User:MastCell. Here's Cool Hand Luke's request for me to be banned. User:MastCell comes out of no where and bans me on my ANI to deal with the personal attacks on me! I am not banned from one page but all of wikipedia! What really upsets me is that all that happened to these personal attack comments were that they were removed from the history of the talk:asian fetish page. Absolutely nothing was said to the people who personally attacked me! How can this be? Please look the ani here. All the decisions made were based on unsupported comments and does not seem to every be backed up with references. Some of the comments from people who attacked me. and some people who are known vandals. I was accused of edit-warring on Asian fetish. It's obvious many have a beef with me. People keep claiming I don't go along with consensus or seek it. I started nearly all the discussions on the talk:Asian fetish page!

But they all end the same way. People wants all sections to be removed! They want to delete any and everything from the page! The people who submitted 2 of the AfD, Saranghae Honey's AfD and Crotalus horridus's AfD, also personally attacked me. And they are the one's making most of the changes that obviously are a continuation of their AfD agenda. Their changes rarely adhere to the wikipedia standards especially letting sources speak for the themselves. They do however gain consensus but WP:CONEXCEPT clearly states that policies trumps consensus, always. So if I am editing to get rid of vandalism or things that do not adhere to wikipedia policies then I am not edit warring! Then again could it be that because I obviously have a minority perspective that many do not agree with? This is topic clearly related to minorities and is a situation in which a minority point of view can be presented on the article.

I don't think I should have been banned. At worse I am one of two parties who are part of this so-called edit war on wikipedia. If I am banned then the people who edit warred with me should be banned as well. But I think I have been ridding the page of vandalism. Look at Asian fetish today and look at how it looked after I made some changes state. The state of the page today is just like it was before I started updating it like here. And I am being blocked and treated like a vandal? I do not deserve this. Tkguy (talk) 03:13, 16 January 2008 (UTC)"

Decline reason: "Your request does not address the edit warring that you were blocked for except to state, wrongly, that you removed vandalism. In fact, you edit warred in a content dispute and have been blocked for it. The conduct of others is not relevant as to whether or not you should be unblocked. — Sandstein (talk) 06:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.


A tag has been placed on Asiaphile, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Asiaphile is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Asiaphile saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please feel free to use deletion review, but do not continue to repost the article if it is deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 07:02, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Tkguy/Asian fetish

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Tkguy/Asian fetish, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Tkguy/Asian fetish. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 07:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Editing restriction

This was archived at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive354#Proposed community topic ban for User:Tkguy on Asian fetish. Like many ANI threads, it didn't garner much continuing interest, but I think there's at least support for a community 1RR restriction on Tkguy for this subject. Here were the independent commentators: Jayron32 (supporting community topic ban), Spartaz (suggesting voluntary 1RR), Jehochman (who insisted that RFC/U should be done first), MastCell and Sandstein (supporting topic ban or at least 1RR). Only Jehochman appeared opposed to community sanction, and he didn't follow up on questions from editors at Talk:Asian fetish, who appear 100% in favor of a topic ban.

It appears that Tkguy has left the project for now, but if he returns, he should know that any edit warring (reverting more than once per day) may result in blocks. Tkguy should try to persuade others on the talk page if he wishes to continue. Cool Hand Luke 03:16, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree and am willing, as an admin uninvolved in the article or related disputes, to supervise and enforce a 1RR on articles related to Asian fetish should Tkguy return. If you (Tkguy) want additional input on this restriction or wish to dispute it further, please bring it up at WP:AN or WP:AN/I. MastCell Talk 04:27, 29 January 2008 (UTC)