User talk:Tjbergsma
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[edit] Welcome!Hello, Tjbergsma, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place [edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:53, 31 January 2008 (UTC) [edit] A Question{{helpme}} To whoever may respond to this question: I recently made an edit to Abraham Kuyper:
Somehow, large parts have disappeared from the article underneath the section that I have edited, and I cannot find out how or why. Thank-you Tjbergsma (talk) 16:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Question over Infobox data{{helpme}} I have a question over the "Infobox Person" in the article Hendrik de Cock. Behind his birth date in brackets it says "(age 206)". I am assuming that is generated somehow because it cannot be edited out. But obviously if he's already died, than he can't be 206... so does anyone have any info on the Infobox? Thanks Tjbergsma (talk) 01:48, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008[edit] Re:ThanksNo problem. :) jj137 (talk) 04:44, 24 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] My editingWhile i salute you in your attempts to clean up wikipedia, and i understand why you were required to take down me edit; Clayton Bennett really is satan. If you look at the evil things he is doing to a great fan base by moving away a team thats been there for 41 years while he bought it with the full intent to move it, then he seems pretty satanic. While i apologize for speaking my opinion on wikipedia, what i said is probably true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.111.195.120 (talk) 03:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Re:Clayton BennettThank you. I'm not even a Sonics fan and i think its horrible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.111.195.120 (talk) 04:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC) [edit] Soverign Grace Ministries
Anyway, I have no personal opinions on the article, to be honest. I have to have a neutral point of view, and I think, definetly, the article has enough sources. However, conflict of interest needs to be addressed. And some of the sources..I think their reliability could be disputed. Steve Crossin (talk) 17:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC) Every source there is a well-known magazine (Charisma, CT) or a well-known author, or an official website. The criticism reference are not paper-published but they are on Wordpress and the hit count is unalterable by the manager of the website: 80,000 people have definitely visited it in 3 months. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Look2008 (talk • contribs) 18:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Do I sleep?Yes, I sleep occasionally. I'm using Huggle to revert vandalism. And, I'm getting sick of vandals. I've joined the Counter Vandalism Unit, and I right now have a zero-tolerance to vandals, whatsoever. But, I havent slept in...48hours, at least. Too busy reverting vandalism. Steve Crossin (talk) 07:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] my edit to hatit was quite funny though :) [edit] Shamrock Texas verification of facts.<I have gone back and added links to various local media articles verifying the facts of the corruption that literally makes Shamroc a dangerous place for anyone not willing to participate in the drug industry. I was working on doing this when you deleted my work as it was in progress. [edit] More Shamrorock, Texas...No. It is I who should apologize. Please forgive me for I am new here. (Even though that is no excuse.) I do so very much appreciate your showing me how to cite references and so forth and I apologize for my previous indiscretions... Just as I have italicized this text and have made no fewer than three attempts at correcting it... Sorry! [edit] Miscellaneousur good man ur good im just here to have fun..and mess crap up so who cares...viva la raza ese... WSRIVAX3 SILENT —Preceding unsigned comment added by Claytonbigsby91 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] vandalisesorry but how did i vandalise any page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.217.186 (talk • contribs) oh, but what defines valuable? i have seen lots of links that point to not much... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.194.217.186 (talk) 02:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] An editI think the last sentence of this edit of yours at User talk:Mikkalai was unconstructive. --Coppertwig (talk) 14:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] The Shamrock page again...Tjbergsma, I want to thank you for fixing the page again. Beliebe it or not, someone had taken down a majority of what we have both done. I tried to put back a copy of what I had rchived but, unfortunately, it was a version from before your edits (which are very much more proper than are mine). Thanks! (I have now saved a copy as you have left it.) [edit] Hellojust stopped by to say hi. 75.144.70.141 (talk) 17:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] Re:User:MikkalaiHis page is on my watchlist because he's been trolled quite a bit. I'm not going to follow him around checking up on his edits, (There's already enough people who are doing that as it is), and I'm not saying he is the poster child for the policies on WP:NPOV and WP:CIVIL, but I will revert obvious trolling any time I see it. --Onorem♠Dil 16:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] Mediator comments pending
[edit] MediationJust a note, I have made a recommendation on the Sovereign Grace talk page, I recommend you review it. Please, I must stress, my recommendation is not binding, only the Arbitration Committee can make binding decisions. That said, I have done my best to make a fair recommendation, and I would like you to review this, and give your comments below my statement. Thanks again, Steve Crossin (talk) 23:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] MediationYou do realise these are exceptional circumstances, and there are strict conditions in order to have it included? Also note the complexity of this case. If I said "no", I would have been taking sides, and no good would have been done. And vice versa. I considered this for a long period of time, also got advice from a former arbitrator. Mediation is about compromise. However, if they do not meet the standard I noted, the link will not be allowed. Are you agreeable to this? Reply on the SGM talk page, thanks. Steve Crossin (talk) 14:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC) [edit] RE: Shamrock, TexasThank you for the message you posted [1] on my talk page. I blocked 216.167.133.217 (talk · contribs) and protected the article as per the WP:AIV report [2] filed by Collectonian (talk · contribs). Let me investigate the situation in more depth and get back to you. --Kralizec! (talk) 00:54, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Shamrock Texas (Again)I am not at all that familiar with your "system" of politics here so, please forgive me if I "cross over" some imaginary "line" that is not very clearly drawn for me to see. My question is as follows: In the "Harassment will not be tolerated" statement that was sent me, I had put forth my OPINION that, just pehaps, the representatives of local media in Shamrock Texas would be forced to resort to hiring individuals to aid us in the correction of the vandalism of our city references as shown on you site. Could some kind-hearted individual PLEASE take the time to explain to me just exactly how this can be considered any more "harrassing" than the constant deletion of information that is extremely pertinent to our community and that has been verified by many numerous governmental and media sources? I'm NOT trying to be a "pain" but, the information sincerely is a "part of the community" and, as do many who live here, we feel that it is our only "claim to fame" in the world. (The Rick Roach drug conspiracy was the first and only time Shamrock was ever mentioned in the New York Times.) Why can these vital (and documented) facts not be left to stand? Are you so selective that you only want your own version of the "facts" available? If that is the case, I need to approach our town council about having you remove the Shamrock Texas page altogether. Can someone please explain this to me? It is all I ask. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.167.143.152 (talk) 03:00, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] 206.82.19.62 at it againI've fixed a number of silly vandalisms by this IP again. I suggest doing whatever is necessary to keep them from wasting our time again. AlanM1 (talk) 12:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC) [edit] Free Reformed Church of North AmericaHello, I have restored the statement "The seminary prohibits women from studying in its Master of Divinity program." to the Free Reformed Church of North America page. You had removed it, claiming I was misquoting the article. This point was clearly stated in the article. Also, do you have an electronic copy of the article you could link to? I do not. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdeboer (talk • contribs) 21:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
|