User talk:TJ Spyke/Archive 16

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Royal Rumble 2008

If the Rumble match is confirmed, then you may want to tell me, why i cant find it here[1]? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diivoo (talk • contribs) 19:44, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

and where on wwe.com is the royal rumble match announced? Diivoo (talk) 23:07, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
yeah, but it has to be somewhere on the page, i still dont see indemand as a good source. i tried to point it out in the no way out talk page, but i just repeat what i was told not only once. and that is, that we only go by wwe.com in this project. [2] if you want to read it.

Diivoo (talk) 00:09, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Schools

Schools have never as far as i can tell been considered to be the sort of organisations applicable to A7. Please use prod, or just merge them. The ip guy does need watching, and I will do so. DGG (talk) 05:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

User and talk page

  • I've also blocked the recent culprits for 24 hours for repeated harassment, although not sure if it was necessary to do that but all IP's, while possibly shared IPs were from different states such as New Jersey, Texas and Maryland - could have been a group of individuals. No problem for the semi-protection by the way--JForget 01:52, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

You may find this interesting

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Hijacking of my previous username AnteaterZot (talk) 01:57, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

The WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter
Issue VII — December 30, 2007
Project News
Current Events
Collaboration of the Week

The Pro Wrestling Collaboration of the Week for December 30 through January 5 is Dusty Rhodes (wrestler). Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Wikipedia professional wrestling related article. The next article for collaboration will be chosen on Sunday, January 6.

Cast your vote to select the collaboration for next week! — Nominate an article that could be greatly improved!
Member Interview

This week's interviewee is The Hybrid. The interview can be viewed here.

  • Next week's interviewee is The Chronic. Submit a question to ask The Chronic here.
Member News
From the Editors

We sincerely hope that all of you had a wonderful Christmas/holiday, and would like to wish you and yours, a very Happy New Year!

Contributors to this Issue:

Discussion • Suggestions • Feedback

You are receiving this because because you are listed as a member of the Professional Wrestling WikiProject. By default, the full newsletter is sent to your talk page. However, you have several delivery options at your disposal. Below are the options:
Delivered: 14:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 90.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GAB 90.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 91.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:GAB 91.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 92.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GAB 92.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:03, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 95.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GAB 95.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 96.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:GAB 96.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 97.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GAB 97.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:05, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:GAB 98.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:GAB 98.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Bring on the '08

Happy New Year TJ!
 Now lets get wasted!

...Try not to drive though...-- bulletproof 3:16 08:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

The Chronic has given you a bottle of Cristal! Cristal costs $350, and hopefully this bottle has made your New Year's Day better. Spread the spirit of the New Year by giving a bottle of Cristal to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Give a bottle of Cristal to someone else by adding {{subst:User:The Hybrid/Finger}} to their talk page with a friendly... wait...

P.S. Scientology LOL! They're gonna sue you... :) 19:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Have A Great Oh-Eight

Happy New Year! iMatthew (talk) 21:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Battlebowl.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Battlebowl.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cooking Mama 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Cooking Mama 2.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Cooking_Mama_2.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Cooking_Mama_2.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 06:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Battlebowl.JPG

I have tagged Image:Battlebowl.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 06:13, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:Ice_Age_2_Wii.jpg

I have tagged Image:Ice_Age_2_Wii.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 06:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fall Brawl 95.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Fall Brawl 95.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fall Brawl 96.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Fall Brawl 96.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fall Brawl 98.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Fall Brawl 98.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BATB 94.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BATB 94.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BATB 96.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BATB 96.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BATB 97.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BATB 97.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BATB 98.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BATB 98.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BATB 99.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BATB 99.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BB 92.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:BB 92.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:BB 93.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:BB 93.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 89.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:HH 89.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 92.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:HH 92.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Open Season Wii.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Open Season Wii.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 94.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:HH 94.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 95.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:HH 95.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 97.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:HH 97.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 98.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:HH 98.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HH 99.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HH 99.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:57, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Season Greetings


Dear TJ Spyke, on behalf of my snow-buried Canadian region of Ottawa, I would like to wish you a Safe and Happy New Year 2008.
JForget 02:31, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Re:Beefcake shaves Adonis

Isn't that what WP:FU is for? Also, can't I cite the PPV instead as a source?Lex T/C Guest Book 05:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Also, WP:YOUTUBE states that there is no full restriction on using th link, and can be used if it follows guidelines. I'd say it would follow WP:FU, as no free image could be found of Beefcake shaving Adonis. I endlessly searched for one... Lex T/C Guest Book 05:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Well, because the YouTube video is from the DVD (notable by the WWE logo in the bottom left corner) can we cite is as a screenshot from the DVD?

PS. If I take a screenshot of the exact moment from the DVD, the image would be exactly the same. Lex T/C Guest Book 06:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

My question is: Can we source it as a screenshot from the DVD? Like I stated above, "If I take a screenshot of the exact moment from the DVD, the image would be exactly the same." Lex T/C Guest Book 06:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok Lex T/C Guest Book 06:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Weren't you going to wait for opinion in WT:C before you will nominate them for deletion? Lex T/C Guest Book 08:03, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

School move question

Hello, I saw that you're involved with the move requests, so I thought I might directly ask you your opinion. I want to move Bedford High School (New Hampshire) to Bedford High School (Bedford, New Hampshire) according to WP:NC(S). Though "Bedford" is redundant, it should be included, as discussed here. Anyway, Bedford High School (Bedford, New Hampshire) is redirecting to Bedford High School (New Hampshire). Both articles have a history, so I'm not sure what to do, and how to make the move appropriately. Please let me know what you think. (You can reply here.) --Dan LeveilleTALK 05:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

It seems like the target page used to be a copy of the current article (hence why it became a redirect) with no significant edit history. I would suggest starting a move request per the instructions at WP:RM. To be on the safe side, go for the full discussion (rather than listing it in the uncontroversial moves section). TJ Spyke 05:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Will do. Thanks. --Dan LeveilleTALK 06:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

I didn't want to get too personal on the Naming Convention's talk page - but how ironic, I go to RIT. Do you go to college or work in Rochester? --Dan LeveilleTALK 09:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Unfortunately no. I don't have a job at the moment (I am looking for one), so I can't afford college at the moment. TJ Spyke 09:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Ohhh, well come to RIT when you get the money! Haha, then come say hi to me :P --Dan LeveilleTALK 09:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hey, since you were involved with the previous discussion, I think I've changed my mind. What do you think about this idea? --Dan LeveilleTALK 06:24, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

RE: Ref names

Well, before I changed the names, this message would appear. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name cannot be a simple integer, use a descriptive title. Cheers, LAX 00:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Please have another look at Pecatonica High School (Wisconsin)

I realize that you commented early at this AFD, and that the article was in really poor shape at the time. Since then, it has been significantly improved, and now has nearly unanimous keep recommendations. Might you take a moment to review the article and AFD, and consider changing your !vote? Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 06:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:R2D

Hey, you made some changes to the New Year's Revolution (2007) article that are contrary to the guideline above (like changing dark match to List of professional wrestling slang#D). It's not a bad contribution, but the guideline states that redirects should be left as they are, and don't need to be direct links (mostly because of all the invisible text which is harder to read in "Edit this page"). However, I'm just telling you for future reference. Cheers, Lex T/C Guest Book 23:56, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

WP:R2D is a guideline, and it frowns on replacing redirects with direct links. That's the exact reason that redirects exist for. Lex T/C Guest Book 00:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Royal Rumble

U guys on wikipedia shud chill out a little! I mean, I watched SmackDown about 3 hours ago, and JBL v Y2J was confirmed, along with Edge v Rey —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfcucl1972 (talk • contribs)

You can't just add stuff without sources though. We usually wait for the US airing anyways since that is what WWE does. TJ Spyke 01:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Just reverted it back to your last version. Don't blame me...-- bulletproof 3:16 03:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Wait until there is a WWE.com source before you add Jericho vs. JBL match. I have added a proper source for the WHC match on WWE.com. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 03:21, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
I tried to but someone else was editing the page at the same time and it gave me an error. It is irrelavent. Wait until there is a WWE.com source for the Jericho vs. JBL match. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 03:24, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
What was wrong with my reference? As far as I know everything was typed correctly and it still didn't work. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 03:46, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

In the Edit Summary box down the bottom, how do you get the right pointing arrow with the grey coloured text? GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 05:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes I figured it out jast after I posted that message. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 06:58, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

What point are you trying to make with your Edit summary for the Royal Rumble qualification matches? GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 08:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

It's not a big deal. Add it if you want. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 08:41, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

What do you think we should do about Snitsky being entered into the Royal Rumble at the house show? It is most probably true, but not sourced anywhere reliable. Not on any WWE programming either. Maybe it wasn't a real match, just a crowd pleaser with no future meaning. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 11:00, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

So unless something is said on the website or on WWE programming, we dont add it? GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 00:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
So iN DEMAND is an accepted source along with WWE.com? There is a website called www.pwmania.com which has spoilers etc and they are always spot on with news etc so I do trust them and they say Snitsky has been added to the Royal Rumble. I don't know whether Wikipedia accepts that source or not. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 00:10, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Okay, I will put him up there. GuffasBorgz7 (talk) 00:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Reply Links

I didn't relize there was a problem with the links. But yeah, go ahead that's fime. :) Neo Samus (talk) 00:32, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

EDIT - oh you mean on the page itself. I thought you were talking about the talk page. I didn't put the info on the main page. I did notice that someone but the date for KOF '94.....which I just realized is the link you are talking about! LOL!!! Thanks for fixing that. Neo Samus (talk) 00:36, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Re KOF: Alright, thanks for fixing that, then. --LN3000 (talk) 00:57, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Ok I see the other edit you are talking about. What's weird is that even though StarTropics is one word, when I made it two it still went to the correct page. Neo Samus (talk) 01:02, 6 January 2008 (UTC)