Talk:Tizer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is supported by the Soft Drinks WikiProject, a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to all non-alcoholic beverages. Please participate by editing the article, and help us improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
WikiProject Scotland
 Tizer is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Scotland Portal
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
WikiProject Scotland To-do:

I think the flavor deserves a mention.

Added a short description. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.146.47.250 (talk • contribs) 21:19, 1 December 2006 (UTC).

I can't see this new "rebranded" flavour lasting too long. It's just tastes like a very poor, watery supermarket value fruit drink now. At the very least it tastes nothing like Tizer. Bad move Barr. 86.2.126.106 16:29, 8 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] 1990s Tizer TV Adverts

Does anyone have more information about the 1990s Tizer adverts on the TV?

User:Lagichinna 20:33PM, 13/06/07

[edit] Annoyed..

With the new packaging. It's lost it's greatness, now it looks like a cheap rip off. Like the supermarket brand "Marz" bars instead or Mars....

And it tastes horrible and looks wrong. I DEMAND MORE ADDITIVES! Brooza 10:44, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
And while we're at it, it no longer stains everthing it comes into contact with. THIS IS NOT RIGHT! Brooza 10:46, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New taste

This latest change does mean the article needs re-writing though!

I'd also be interested to see the original original rec. from 1924 and at several points inbetween... someone must have old packaging etc... (although maybe back in 1924 it wasnt common or required to list ingredients in the same way it is today).

Either way, I dont think the articles should describe the current drink as 'very sweet' - thats one thing its definately NOT anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.171.129.72 (talk) 12:01, 23 January 2008 (UTC)