Talk:Tippecanoe and Tyler too

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tippecanoe and Tyler too has had a peer review by Wikipedia editors which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, an attempt to improve, organise and standardise Wikipedia's articles in the area of politics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low	This article is on a subject of low-importance in Politics.
Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	This article is within the scope of the United States presidential elections WikiProject. This project provides a central approach to United States presidential elections-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)

A fact from Tippecanoe and Tyler too appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on March 7, 2007.

[edit] context

I can't quite figure out what this article is about. A song? A political slogan? A logo? Is seems like there's just not enough context. -- Mikeblas 03:18, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

It's about a song (virtually the entire article is just about the song), and also discusses the slogan derived from that song (which as it happens, is much better remembered than the song itself today). The slogan is only explicitly discussed in the last line of the intro, so I'm not sure where that confusion could come from.--Pharos 04:32, 8 March 2007 (UTC)