Talk:Tin Foil Phoenix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Incorrectly tagged for speedy delete
An artist that is signed and recording for major labels 604 Records/Universal Music in North America and Roadrunner Records in Europe and are perpetual touring partners for artists such as Nickelback, Theory of a Deadman and Thornley - is more than enough notability to stave off deletion no matter how horribly that article mat be written. 156.34.213.146 04:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- OK, I buy your argument and I have removed the speedy request. Phaedrus86 04:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- Glad to hear that, I was about to add in about the group being written about in several notable music publications including: JAM music[1](owned/run by The National Post, Uptown Magazine[2], View Magazine[3], Chart Attack[4] and The Sun[5]. More than enough notability to remain. Article definitely deserves a {cleanup} tag and an {unreferenced} tag. But passes WP:BAND, WP:MUSIC with ease. 216.21.150.44 04:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'll have to keep my head down for while after that :-) But seriously, I suggest you add this information. It all helps to flesh out the article and show readers firstly that they are notable, and secondly allows them to see different aspects of the band. Phaedrus86 04:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Glad to hear that, I was about to add in about the group being written about in several notable music publications including: JAM music[1](owned/run by The National Post, Uptown Magazine[2], View Magazine[3], Chart Attack[4] and The Sun[5]. More than enough notability to remain. Article definitely deserves a {cleanup} tag and an {unreferenced} tag. But passes WP:BAND, WP:MUSIC with ease. 216.21.150.44 04:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
-
-
This group is no longer signed to a major label and are not really touring presently. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.42.206.16 (talk) 09:25, 30 April 2008 (UTC) If Parish and the Ben Jackson Group, much more notable bands who keep getting marked for Speedy Deletion aren't apparently worthy of Wiki, then why has this page been left? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.42.206.16 (talk) 09:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
