User talk:Timothy Clemans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Write a new message.

Contents

[edit] Andrew Wiles

I think that you've done some good work so far. I looked at the article as it was before you first edited it, and you have done much to improve it. A four-month research project should yield a great article. NatusRoma | Talk 05:57, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

The introduction that you have right now is pretty good. I would take away the sentence that says "In the field of number theory, he is one of the most rigorous and deep thinkers." That is an opinion statement that can't really be verified. The rest is good, though. NatusRoma | Talk 19:47, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for not getting back to you sooner–I was in transit when you left me the last message. I would suggest putting back in some more about the proof of FLT. Also, there used to be something about Birch & Swinnerton-Dyer, but there isn't anymore. The list of awards is nice. I might do a little work on the article a little later. NatusRoma | Talk 03:10, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Rory096 20:49, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Um, so? --Rory096 20:55, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Rory096

Regardless of your opinion on a template, there's never a reason to insult an editor, like you did here. Please take into consideration that personal attacks are not allowed here on Wikipedia, and may cause you to be blocked for disruption if you continue. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 20:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] E. E. Escultura

Good points. I was going to ask him to move the discussion to a user talk page the next time he replied. —Keenan Pepper 19:07, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] KCLS block

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "wifi network"

Decline reason: "Your account is not blocked, please log in from another network."

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

I am trying to use the WIFI access at the Burien library branch of the King Country Library System. The IP 206.188.34.200 is blocked, because it is believed to be an open proxy. The wireless point name is "kcls.org Wireless". Timothy Clemans 22:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Your actual account is not blocked, please log in from another network. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image in FLT article

Your edit summary says: remove Diophantus-II-8-Fermat.jpg for it is shown twice so remove the one in area that is farest away from topic of image thus the intro. You haven't looked carefully at the images; they are not the same. One is the edition that Fermat read, with the margin where he supposedly wrote his proof. The second one is the version annotated with Fermat's comments, which is where the theorem was first mentioned. I am sure the way they are displayed could be improved (we could maybe have them one next to the other, or something like that), but they are both significant and deserve to be in the article. Schutz 06:55, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Edits on my talk page

Just wanted to point out that while editing my talk page, you removed by mistake a completely separate section (see [1]). It was the weekly spam for the SignPost, so nothing too important, but better safe than sorry for the next time... Schutz 23:01, 26 July 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Vandalism on Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/Tools/Spamlist

In this edit, you removed my subscription to the Wikipedia Signpost spamlist; I don't really see how you can have done this my mistake, since you did not change anything else with this edit. Do you have an explanation for this ? Schutz 16:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes I removed yours on purpose, because it seemed like you did not want it for you keep removing from your talk page. Timothy Clemans 04:54, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I should have asked you about it and now that I am thinking about it you did alert me to my mistake with the signpost removal on your talkpage. Well at least you found out that your name got removed. Timothy Clemans 04:58, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
I remove it from my talk page once I have read the signpost. The goal of the subscription is to alert me (via the "You have a new message" box) of a new edition of the signpost, not to collect the table of content of all past editions. Schutz 22:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Today's featured article

Just wanted to let you know a featured article you worked on, 0.999..., was featured today on the Main Page. Tobacman 00:39, 25 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Neil deGrasse Tyson?

I actually think he is atheist, where is your source for that statement? I am simply curious though. LinkinPark 17:53, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Bill O'Reilly biography

Re: Bill O'Reilly article. Good working with you on the biography by Kitman, hope we cross (wiki)paths again in the future. Take care. R. Baley 09:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of William A. Stein

An article that you have been involved in editing, William A. Stein, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William A. Stein. Thank you. -- mms 00:52, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Infobox software3

A template you created, Template:Infobox software3, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 18:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Sagecontourplot.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Picture 32.png. The copy called Image:Picture 32.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 01:44, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image copyright problem with Image:Sagecontourplot.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Sagecontourplot.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:00, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Sagescreenshotbluehat.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sagescreenshotbluehat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 06:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Possibly unfree Image:Sagecontourplot.png

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sagecontourplot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 06:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Where do you get the idea that the image is not released under Creative Commons by-sa as the image's Flickr page says? That screenshot was made for http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-psf/issues/detail?id=300 where the author clearly states that it is released under CC-by-sa. Timothy Clemans (talk) 06:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Nevermind, I finally found where you actually wrote what you were thinking. See http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-psf/issues/detail?id=300 Timothy Clemans (talk) 06:36, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
I'm copying your comments to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images/2008 January 21#Image:Sagecontourplot.png, where it will be visible to more editors. Let's continue the discussion there. —Bkell (talk) 06:43, 21 January 2008 (UTC)