User talk:Timata1705

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:HaresFW.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:HaresFW.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 13:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:MiceFW.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MiceFW.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. OsamaK 13:51, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image summary Expanded

The Image summary for this, the above and five other images have been expanded to include source and author --14:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Timata1705

[edit] Work on The Animals of Farthing Wood

I have to thank you for all of the work you have put into the Character pages. Several months ago I began work on them, but have been too busy ever since to do much with them except for reverting the occassional vandalism. The pages are beginning to look really good, especially with the new screenshots! MelicansMatkin 17:13, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Timata1705 17:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Your very welcome, its given me a great opportunity to re-watch the entire three series' again. I've just reached the end of the A Joke Backfires in the second season and paused for a break, but I should be resuming them soon. May also have to get my magazines out :D
As I said, they look fantastic. I only have a slight issue with them though, and that is that they seem to be based solely on the Television series. Since the books take precedence, I think that the main part of the articles should be taken from the books with additonal details from the television series following (so if I add information before the text that you've written, please don't be offended! ;) By the way, just a quick fact that I found interesting but did you know that The Shrews were never in the books, but were created solely for the TV series? MelicansMatkin 17:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
Of course. I have most of the books too, so I can always reread them and check anything you add :) I expect there is quite a difference, with a lot of the characters changing genders and so on. I honestly can't remember the books that much, particularly how their characterisation differed, if at all, from the TV Series. I think I'll reread them anyway, out of interest. I didn't know the Shrews weren't in the books until I read it in the article, makes me wonder why they were created, since they ended up playing such a minor role. Timata1705 18:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use disputed for Image:VolesFW.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:VolesFW.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Summary Expanded --Timata1705 08:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ShrewsFW.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ShrewsFW.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Summary Expanded --Timata1705 15:53, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed Images

I noticed that one of the screenshots you created for the Shrews was tagged as disputed. I'm glad to see that you resolved it straight away, but I know that you've also created more screenshots than just that one image. I had a similar dispute the other day, and I noticed that it was because no article was mentioned in the rationale box. I went through and saw that all of my pictures had the same problem. If you haven't already done so, I just wanted to recommend to you that you add the articles to all of the rationale boxes of your images. Hopefully then they won't be tagged. MelicansMatkin 19:56, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I think I'll check through the others as well, just in case. Thanks. --Timata1705 21:24, 24 October 2007 (UTC)