User talk:Tim Shuba

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please post new messages at the bottom of the talk page, use headings when starting new talk topics, and sign all contributions.

Contents

[edit] Portal:Thailand

Thanks for adding more item. I think the Hem article is interesting. Too bad there's no image we can use for the portal. It's such a pain that those deletionists don't consider portals worthy of fair-use! --Melanochromis 17:16, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Day of rest / Sabbath

Some definitions of Sabbath are examples of a Day of rest, but they are not one and the same. The definition of Day of rest is linked from several other articles where a link to Sabbath (in lieu of Day of rest) would not properly define the term. As the definition stands on its own, as no content was merged into the Sabbath article, and as it would not make logical sense to place it in the Sabbath article, the changes have been reverted. Alansohn 20:02, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kievan Rus

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Kievan Rus'. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. --133.41.84.206 08:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Herbert Dingle

I've never run across you editing to the best of my recollection, but you seem a reasonable sort. Perhaps you could take initiative on an RFC or something? At this point I'm going to guess that nobody there sees me as a neutral good faith party (I think I've managed to somehow be on the opposite "side" of everyone there)... otherwise I would do it. Consensus should not be all that hard to achieve with some influx of outside opinions.--Isotope23 talk 14:14, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

I've thought about this, and I'm going to refrain from starting an RfC, though it's probably the best way forward. I'd rather see how others handle it, especially as I'm intending to mostly ignore wikipedia for quite a while due to other projects. Tim Shuba 04:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
Fair enough!--Isotope23 talk 13:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your comments on my AFD "CITIES BY LONGITUDE"

I saw your comment on my AFD for Cities by Longitude, and I about laughed my ass off. IF it was malformed as you say it was, then why the hell was it in the AFD pile to begin with? (It was placed in the pile on Nov 9, and votes can in Nov 10 on!!!) Your first comment , like I said was comical enough, but then to say it's encyclopedic tells me you don't know what the heck you're talking about. Read this then tell me it meets this criteria. (FYI - It doesn't). Next time be a man about it and say "KEEP BECAUSE WP:ILIKEIT". KoshVorlon ".. We are ALL Kosh..." 18:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Apparently it was opined (AFD's are not votes) upon because editors saw the AFD at the article. It wasn't correctly listed until Dumbot caught it on the 11th.--Isotope23 talk 20:26, 12 November 2007 (UTC)