User talk:TimTE01
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] AfD nomination of Bravery's source
I have nominated Bravery's source, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bravery's source. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Lenticel (talk) 11:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Bravery's source
A tag has been placed on Bravery's source requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 12:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Prospero
Not sure why you think it's relevant to link one of the characters in "The Masque of the Red Death" to a Shakespeare character (maybe you should check the article you're linking to before you link to it?), but even it if was relevant, there's no need to link to it half a dozen times in the same article. See WP:OVERLINK, too. --Midnightdreary (talk) 17:13, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
