Talk:Timelords (role-playing game)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I notice there's no real information here about the actual backstory/concept of the game... if no one else adds it soon, I'll start working on that. Hossenfeffer 03:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
- I actually have copies of the first and second edition of this game. I'll dig them up, get some photos, and try to expand a bit on the history and gameplay sections.Allegrorondo 15:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The Designers' Demise
I own a copy of the second edition rulebook, and it mentions the war with Lucifier as the cause of The Designers' destruction; therefore it is not a new addition to the history of setting. Bear Eagleson
- Thanks. First Edition didnt mention Lucifer, but I made the changes as Second is the main focus of the article.Allegrorondo
I've got my second edition copy open in front of me (dated Febuary 1990). According to it Lucifer (or rather "Lightbearer") didn't cause the destruction of the Designers but instead survived it. The actual cause is said to be Appolyon, aka "The Destroyer". Both Lightbeaer and The Destroyer were modified sophonts from worlds within the Designer's sphere of influence. Appolyon was created to be the living monument to the Designer's civilisation but proved psychologically unsuited to the task, instead naming himself The Destroyer and single handedly wiping out the Designers. Lightbearer was a homosapien who had been modified, as an experiment, in a simular fashion to Appolyon but not to the same degree. When The Destroyer shattered the habitat where Lightbearer and his family were held all the other homosapiens there died while Lightbearer's implanted matrix transported him away. Appolyon and Lightbearer then fought a long TimeWar which eventually led to Appolyon's defeat and imprisonment. PlanetNiles
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Timelords 2nd ed.jpg
Image:Timelords 2nd ed.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Timelords3rd.jpg
Image:Timelords3rd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2008 (UTC)