Talk:Timeline of the Enron scandal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Texas, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Texas.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject Houston This article is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to the Greater Houston area. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project where you join the group and contribute to the discussion.
Portal:Houston
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
(If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)


"Skilling is hit in the face with a pie during a visit to California." That's certainly interesting... ugen64 03:04, Feb 20, 2004 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Enron Stock Prices 2001-2002

Anyone know where I can find the value of Enron stock from 2000-2002?

[edit] Anyone have factual data on Enron's earlier years?

Does anyone have any entries this detailed on Enron's business from its start in the 80's to now? I'd really like to see any portion of this scandal evaluated from the long term perspective of when all of this started going wrong.


[edit] Someone should add any 2005 events

I'm not an expert on the subject but I know there were some legal developments in 2005. Would someone with more knowledge like to update the timeline?

  • There seems to be some "asleep at the wheel" going on here, seriously Holon67 17:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Are links to month names really needed?

I see several links to just months. I can understand links like "January 8" because it's one of many things that may have happened that day. Links to specific months appear to have no relation to the article and should be change to plain text in my opinion. Many of the words in this article have could be linked to their own pages, but are not relevant to this article page. I understand this is a timeline, but I still do not think the definition of a month is required or adds anything to the article.

Should the month links be removed?

Yes, and the links like "January 8" are because you can set your preferences to display dates in different ways. See WP:MOSNUM. Rich Farmbrough, 10:46 28 April 2007 (GMT).