Talk:Tim Shaw (DJ)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was requested that this article be renamed but the procedure outlined at WP:RM#How to request a page move did not appear to be followed, and consensus could not be determined. Please request a move again with proper procedure if there is still a desire for the page to be moved. Thank you for your time! -- tariqabjotu 01:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] 50p Lotus
So what happened to the car? Did the sale go through, or did the wife call it off? Any info on the lucky buyer? Pimlottc 18:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Like every controversial thing he does, it turned out to be a publicity stunt Anon Dude 18:30, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- That's not true! His wife sold his Lotus for 50p, and it went in 5 minutes. DanCrowter 08:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Tim's mobile experiment?
Should it be added in? You know say what the experiment was and what the results were.
Depends, did he get a telling off for it? did he get the results will it get romoved
[edit] I HATE TIM SHAW
Does anything else need to be said!!!! Oh, yeh, please visit my homepage and argue ( if you can) why you do like Tim Shaw. Andrew 10:04, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pointless Comment
Why do we really need to know you hate Tim Shaw? I hate fat people who constantly eat and then cry about being fat claiming it's not their fault, if there was a wiki for that I wouldn't comment about it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.21.17.86 (talk • contribs) 11:52, 4 December 2006 (UTC).
A major point in the pre-kerrang section was wrong. I have corrected this. Link here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/564667.stm
[edit] Controversy statement
I'm unsure if the statements are just PR conjecture or genuinely founded. His agency seem to suggest it is founded and it is mentioned numerous times on the show. I don't think there's much reason to doubt it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.43.64.70 (talk) 18:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC).
[edit] ... Next Door
Ween hole next door has now been replaced by Knobholder next door. Someone should correct this. DanCrowter 08:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Timshaw.jpg
Image:Timshaw.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 15:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)