Talk:Tim McGraw discography
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Suspicions
There should be an article about the song Suspicions (Eddie Rabbitt song) which was first a number 1 for Eddie Rabbitt in 1979 and now has been revived as a hit by Tim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BravesFan2006 (talk • contribs)
-
- I have started a stub on the song; see Suspicions (Eddie Rabbitt song). Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:46, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Singles
I separated singles into 2 portions. Some good things are:
- there aren't lots of empty spaces; look nicer
- easier to add a new column
I think we can leave it for a week for everyone to take a look. (Please do not revert!) Please left a message here for the idea. After a week, we will decided to keep it or to kick it. If we all agree this idea, we can also fix other discographis which has long single lists, like George Strait discography. by Langdon (talk) 02:11, 31 March 2008 (UTC)i7114080
- I think it makes the singles table needlessly complicated. I also disagree with splitting the guest singles on this particular disocgraphy, as they were promoted as official singles, not just songs he lent his vocals to. Eric444 (talk) 02:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Guest singles
Are there any other opinions about creating a separate section for guest singles? When "Bring on the Rain" replaced "The Cowboy in Me" at #1 in 2002, McGraw became the first artist to replace himself at Number One in 20 years. I think his singles table should reflect that. These songs were credited by Billboard as full-fledged duets, and shouldn't be reduced to guest apperances. Eric444 (talk) 04:39, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have to point out: those duet singles actually did not released by Tim. And the singles did not follow Tim's single chronology. (Another single is released only when the previous one is falling down.) Who acutally released 2 singles at the same time? Tim did, but the second one only reach #49. No artist would do that! So those guest singles should be separated. By Langdon (talk) 05:05, 9 April 2008 (UTC)i7114080