Talk:Tim Foli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Tim Foli has been listed as one of the Everyday life good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
July 2, 2006 Good article nominee Listed
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
Flag
Portal
Tim Foli is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of baseball and baseball-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
This page is part of the scope of WikiProject New York Yankees, a WikiProject which aims to develop and expand Wikipedia's coverage of the New York Yankees. Please feel free to join us.

[edit] Technical terms

Hi. Baseball is a complete mystery to me - I'm English. This is a nicely written article, but you may want to think about a couple of remainin uses of jargon. I've got no idea what things like 'free swinger' or 'draft pick' mean and, unlike most of the terms in the article, they're not explained or linked. Cheers. 4u1e 06:35, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion. I linked to Draft (sports), although following the trail from Major League Baseball Draft or List of MLB first overall draft choices would have gotten you there eventually.  :) As for "free swinger", that's not a real technical term. It's a more casual term meaning a batter that doesn't wait for walks very often. In the article, use of this term is followed by an example of how Foli even broke a record for his low walk total. I'll try to think of a way to explain this more thoroughly. Thanks again!  :) —Wknight94 (talk) 11:16, 3 July 2006 (UTC)