Talk:Tilden's Law of Robotics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Tilden's Law of Robotics is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, an attempt to standardise coverage of Robotics. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the Project's quality scale. Please rate the article and then leave a short summary here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.
???	This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale.

This is my first attempt to contribute to wikipedia, so please be kind to the new kid. The article has been marked as "non-notable, outside a narrow interest group or constituency, or should be because of its particular importance or impact."

I simply don't see how this can be the case. I only created the page because I was surprised to find that wikipedia didn't already have such an entry. I created a seperate entry because Asimov's laws have their own article outside of the main Isaac Asimov page.

Can anyone shed some light on the subject?

(I removed the note because I disagreed with the non-noteble thing)DalekSec 17:03, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

"Non-notable" seems to get tossed around quite a bit here, as a euphemism for who knows what. Just dredge up some legitimate references and you'll be fine. Salad Days 07:55, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Idea

This just revealed itself to me.

• A human being must protect its existence at all costs.
• A human being must obtain and maintain access to its own power source.
• A human being must continually search for better power sources.

Here is Man, creating robot in his image and likeness. Soulrefrain (Talk) 00:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Could it be, that Matrix robots were following these three instead of the Asimov three? 84.50.20.95 (talk) 23:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)