User talk:Tigerbronco

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Ellen Moceri, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Ellen Moceri. If you remove the {{dated prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Yanksox 21:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Image Tagging for Image:Mx lacrosse2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mx lacrosse2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Estabrook squabble

I have no long-term objection to deleting our largely unnecessary argument at Talk:Middlesex School, but I'd like to see the revisions made first. Once they're carried out, I wholeheartedly endorse deleting the whole thing. Still, are you really surprised that you wrote a section on a controversial topic and an NPOV debate ensued? --Venicemenace 20:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Never mind - I've decided to join you in yanking the debate. Considering you support East Fields development, I'm sure you will do a fine job of making the section NPOV. The whole Thoreau/Minutemen argument has long irritated me because I see it as specious and not really relevant to the true issue, and that's why I dove into the conversation in the first place. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to enjoy the weekend. Your favorite "middle aged" gadfly, --Venicemenace 02:42, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image tagging for Image:Estabrook woods3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Estabrook woods3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Unspecified source for Image:Estabrook woods.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Estabrook woods.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Strangerer (Talk) 01:47, 3 April 2007 (UTC)